REPP logo banner adsolstice ad
site map
Google Search REPP WWW register comment
home
repp
energy and environment
discussion groups
calendar
gem
about us
employment
 
REPP-CREST
1612 K Street, NW
Suite 202
Washington, DC 20006
contact us
discussion groups
efficiencyefficiency hydrogenhydrogen solarsolar windwind geothermalgeothermal bioenergybioenergy hydrohydro policypolicy
Bioenergy Archive for April 2002
94 messages, last added Tue Nov 26 17:13:50 2002

[Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Research Topics



In a message dated 4/21/02 6:31:33 PM Eastern Daylight Time, Andries.Weststeijn@essent.nl writes:


Natural gas can in fact be fired quite easy in an utility style coal plant, provided of course that gas burners have been installed.
The funny thing is that it is easier to fire full power on gas, than to cofire gas with coal on a -say-  50/50 basis.


Andries:

I should have been more clear on my comment, and I acknowledge that your comment that gas can be successfully used in a coal fired plant is often correct. However, not always.

At the utility I worked at, we studied conversion of two of our four coal fired units to gas. We determined that it was a bad idea.

First, the cost of getting gas to those units was huge, since there was no infrastructure.

Second, we modeled a de-rate in those units. It has been too long for me to remember exactly what parameters worked against us, but I recall something about the difference in heat transfer of the flame characteristics. I badly assumed that this problem that I observed held true for all coal plants -- a careless act on my part.

Third, the efficiency -- compared to combined cycle gas -- was just not there.

Fred Murrell
Biomass Development
Bradenton Florida USA