REPP logo banner adsolstice ad
site map
Google Search REPP WWW register comment
home
repp
energy and environment
discussion groups
calendar
gem
about us
employment
 
REPP-CREST
1612 K Street, NW
Suite 202
Washington, DC 20006
contact us
discussion groups
efficiencyefficiency hydrogenhydrogen solarsolar windwind geothermalgeothermal bioenergybioenergy hydrohydro policypolicy
Digestion Archive for December 2001
13 messages, last added Tue Nov 26 17:15:28 2002

[Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: DIG-L: Ammonia in Biomethanation !!!!!!



Thanks for the responce.
The sulfide odour not being detected is still a mystery for us.and yes probably Sulfide odour was not detected physiologically.
The design of the gas collection systemn is such that once the water levels are down, the reactor becomes partially open to air. Also as a precautionary measure, we had been pumping  approx. 500 -700 m3/hr (Reactor volume 2300 m3) of air in the reactor during the  biomass unloading.
(And still the ammonia smell persisted and no sulfide smell)
Regards,
Avadhut Bapat
----- Original Message -----
To: OLEL
Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2001 1:58 AM
Subject: RE: DIG-L: Ammonia in Biomethanation !!!!!!

The mystery to me is not the strong ammonia smell, probably due to the high loading rates CB mentioned earlier, but why no sulfide odor was detected.  Is it possible that the intense ammonia odors masked the sulfide?  Was there any laboratory analysis of the fumes from the repair effort?  Olfactory fatigue for hydrogen sulfide occurs quickly at high concentrations.  OSHA warns that sulfide levels of 300 ppm or higher cause the olfactory nerve to lose sensitivity (even higher levels cause death!).  Is it possible that the concentrations of sulfides were such that its' detection was no longer physiologically possible whereas, ammonia detection was not inhibited in the same way?

Patrick Griffith, P.E.
Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts
1955 Workman Mill Road
Whittier, CA  90601
(562) 699-7411 x2117
FAX (562) 692-9690
pgriffith@lacsd.org

-----Original Message-----
From: OLEL [mailto:olel@vsnl.net]
Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 3:04 AM
To: cbocch@bocchtech.com
Cc: digestion@crest.org
Subject: Re: DIG-L: Ammonia in Biomethanation !!!!!!

Hello & Thanks,
We dont have 4 digestors. We have only 2 !!  These have been designed on a VLR of 15 kg/m3/day. The total volume of the 2 reactors is 4768 m3.The BOD/COD and the TKN values for the other reactor are the same  as these 2 reactors are operated (Fed)thro a single Buffer Tank. 
Thanks!!,
Avadhut
 
----- Original Message -----
From: cbocch
To: OLEL
Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 4:16 PM
Subject: Re: DIG-L: Ammonia in Biomethanation !!!!!!

Hello again,

my experience with uasb digesters is that they operate at very low BOD levels which is why they have a high throughput.
From your figures yours is a very high BOD input; this would explain the ammonia; digestion is not as complete as it should be and BOD is probably being throughput too fast.

Perhaps diluting the BOD, or extending the retention time up to 15 - 19 days as opposed 3 - 5 days for a standard uasb.
What are the BOD and ammonia readings from the other 3 operational digesters that you have there?
What retention time are you using in your uasb digesters?
 

Regards
CB

OLEL wrote:

 Thanks for an instant responce !!1.The pH of the Distillery Spentwash is around 4. But the pH of the Raw effluent is adjusted to 6 to 6.5 before it enters the UASB system by using the Biocarbonate Alkalinity from the treated Effluent(Which is recycled in a buffer Tank , where it gets mixed with the raw Effluent) and an external addition of Lime to the Buffer Tank.2. We are not using Proprietory Bactria or Organic Media Cells.3. I didn't understant what  you mean by UASB as a Dilute Process.Would be grateful if you could explain.   The COD of the Distillery Spentwash is 100000 mg/L. The organic Concentration entering the reactor after dilution and mixing with the recycled flow is 30000- 40000 mg/L(COD) !!!! Thanks again for the responce.,Avadhut Bapat.
----- Original Message -----
From: cbocch
To: OLEL
Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 10:53 AM
Subject: Re: DIG-L: Ammonia in Biomethanation !!!!!!
 Chances are the pH is the determination factor of the excess ammonia.
Are you using proprietory bacteria?
Organic media cells for the bacteria?

UASB is a very dilute process and the absence of H2S is not surprising; but this is dependant on the throughflow rate of your wastes.

A low pH will deliver excess ammonia residues.

Just my two bobs worth

good luck

Regards
Carmine Bocchino

OLEL wrote:

I operate an anaerobic UASB system for the treatment of 700m3/day Cane molasses based Distillery Spentwash.This plant has been in operation for the last 6 years.One of the UASB ractors was recently opened for the repairs of the feed distribution Network. Besides many interesting findings , one puzzling observation was that, throughout the period when the Anaerobic Biomass was being removed from the reactor(i. e. for about 3  weeks) , a very strong odour of Ammonia was persistent in the reactor.  Actually H2S smell was expected as the Spentwash contains high concentrations of sulfates and the Anaerobic Biomass contains Sulfate Reducing Bacteria. But No H2S smell was encountered. Can somebody please throw some light on the possible reasons for the presence of this strong Ammonia smell ?? P.S. 1.No external Nitrogen was being added as the TKN  concentration in the distillery spentwash is in the range of 1000 to 1500 mg/L. 2. Moderate quantities of yeast may have accumulated in the reactor(Source: Distillery Spentwash). Thanks., Avadhut Bapat