crest logo banner adsolstice ad
site map
Main    Discussion Archives register comment
home
energy and environment
discussion groups
calendar
repp
gem
about us
employment
discussion groups
efficiency efficiency miropower micropower solar solar wind wind geothermal geo bioenergy bioenergy hydro hydro
Ev Archive for July 1998
1169 messages, last added Wed Aug 08 18:42:41 2001

[Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: motor problems/opportunitie




>Peter wants to add some other things, such as a permanent magnet
>field.  Shari warns about making too many changes in a comfortable
>environment, but Peter thinks that the additional efficiency and
>the possibility of regen will outweigh the slightly lower torque.

>Eric

	I personally wouldn't go for a permanent magnet field. If you have a
strong enough magnetic field for good torque, then the generated back EMF will
limit rpm, and hence power. There is no practical way to field weaken a brush
PM motor. There is in a brushless DC motor by careful manipulation of the
stator coils. It takes expensive magnets to resist de-magnetisation, and the
most expensive Neodimuim Iron Boron rusts like mad unless coated (the Lynch
motor uses galvanised magnets). The low inductance of a PM motor (there is less
iron near to the armature coils) makes implementation of the boost circuit for
regen harder.
	I know the Lynch works well, but it's not big enough for the typical
car (it also has a 4000 max rpm rating).

	I'd vote for a sep-ex motor. I make a distinction over shunt motors, a
sep-ex motor has a field capable of generating a flux equal to that of a series
field (at full rated voltage). Regen can be achieved mainly through field
control. Interpoles are highly desirable for improved commutation.



	paul.compton@bbsrc.ac.uk		paulceps@aol.com

	Technical officer for the ECA

	Tel No. +44 (0)1582 573195 home
		    (0)1582 763133 ext 2413 work

	Join the UK Electric Car Association!		28 pounds per annum
	Payment in Sterling only.			35 pounds overseas
	ECA website http://users.abling.co.uk/eca/