crest logo banner adsolstice ad
site map
Main    Discussion Archives register comment
home
energy and environment
discussion groups
calendar
repp
gem
about us
employment
discussion groups
efficiency efficiency miropower micropower solar solar wind wind geothermal geo bioenergy bioenergy hydro hydro
Ev Archive for June 2000
1551 messages, last added Wed Aug 08 18:48:52 2001

[Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Proper Buddy Pairing



David Roden described one of the two common ways to "buddy" batteries:
> I think that what you want looks something like this.  Here the === and
> ### are heavy cable, the --- and | are light.  The +BBB- is a battery.
> 
>            #===-BBB+===-BBB+===-BBB+===-BBB+===#
>            #   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   #
> Pack neg===#   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   #===Pack pos
>            #   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   #
>            #===-BBB+===-BBB+===-BBB+===-BBB+===#

The other arrangements is like this:

  Pack neg=======-BBB+   -BBB+===-BBB+   -BBB+=======Pack pos
                 #   #   #   #   #   #   #   #
                 #   #   #   #   #   #   #   #
                 #   #   #   #   #   #   #   #
                 -BBB+===-BBB+   -BBB+===-BBB+

In this case, all the wires are heavy gauge (1/0 etc.). The staggered
arrangement is because batteries have such low resistance that the
interconnects become a substantial part of the total. Taking the + off
one, and the - off the other equalizes the number of connections and
wire lengths for each of the parallelled batteries.

The two are largely equivalent. Which you choose depends a lot on how
the batteries are physically located.
-- 
Lee A. Hart                 Ring the bells that still can ring
814 8th Ave. N.             Forget your perfect offering
Sartell, MN 56377 USA       There is a crack in everything
(612) 533-3226              That's how the light gets in
<leeahart@earthlink.net>            Leonard Cohen