crest logo banner adsolstice ad
site map
Main    Discussion Archives register comment
home
energy and environment
discussion groups
calendar
repp
gem
about us
employment
discussion groups
efficiency efficiency miropower micropower solar solar wind wind geothermal geo bioenergy bioenergy hydro hydro
Ev Archive for July 2000
1233 messages, last added Wed Aug 08 18:49:09 2001

[Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: GE Motor



Hello Henry and everyone,

Actually I didn't make compensation windings, I just wanted to add them if I 
could get them from GE.  I'm adding a winding for Regen use.  The GE motor
has lots of room inside and I thought mabey I could use the compensation 
winding for regen.  But they proably wouldn't work anyway since they are out of 
phase with the brush timing.  I'm going to add a winding around the existing 
field coil using smaller wire that I can enerjize with a seperate regen circuit.
I have no idea how much energy I need to make a decent amount of regen current.
but I guess I will find out when I get the motor casing back from the motor 
shop.

Steve

On Sun Jul 30 10:58:02 2000, ev@listproc.sjsu.edu wrote:

> >
> >I did Contact GE and talked with one of thier engineers in Virginia.
> >Unfortunately he could not find any info about the motor.  I found a
> >exploded view of the motor on thier web site but it had no part numbers.
> >I wanted to add a fan to the motor and also compensation windings which
> >were available for that series motor, but without part numbers they couldn't
> >tell me if they had them.  I finally gave up, I'll have to use an external
> >blower and make my own windings.
> >
> >Steve Richardson
> 
> Okay Steve, tell us how you made the compensation windings. I suppose you 
> just use the same size wire as the armature and connect them in series with 
> the brushes? But how did you figure out the number of turns required, and 
> what else was involved? I've gone through three old electric motor books 
> and haven't found info on doing calculations for compensation windings. 
> And, we are talking about interpoles here, right?
> 
> Henry Deaton
> 
> 



  • Follow-Ups: