|
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
| Ev Archive for January 2001 |
 |
| 1553 messages, last added Wed Aug 08 18:50:48 2001 |
[Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: OT / Tankless Heating
>> First, resistive heating elements are by definition 100% efficient.
>> Every last KW is converted to BTUs. No gas burner can come close to
>> matching this efficiency.
Eric Jelinski wrote:
> Sorry; try exergy analysis.
What is the definition of "exergy", please? I don't find it in any of my
Physics, Thermodynamics, or Heat Transfer textbooks.
> Exergy analysis takes into account the entropy lost...
Entropy I understand (or, I did when I passed my thermodynamics finals
:-)
I think I get your point. Burning fuel remotely at a power plant to make
electricity, to generate heat on your home is inefficient, too. But I
was simply looking at the microclimate. You pay for X amount of energy
to come into your home. If you want hot water, 100% of the electrical
energy gets converted into heat inside your water heater. If you burn
gas, only a fraction of that energy heats the water; the rest heats the
air, the chimney, etc. You need more BTUs of fuel with gas, but at
current prices, you'll pay less per BTU for gas than for electricity.
--
Lee A. Hart The three laws of thermodynamics (simplified)
814 8th Ave. N. 1. You can't win.
Sartell, MN 56377 USA 2. You can't break even.
leeahart_at_earthlink.net 3. You can't stop playing the game.
 |
 |
|
|