crest logo banner adsolstice ad
site map
Main    Discussion Archives register comment
home
energy and environment
discussion groups
calendar
repp
gem
about us
employment
discussion groups
efficiency efficiency miropower micropower solar solar wind wind geothermal geo bioenergy bioenergy hydro hydro
Ev Archive for January 2001
1553 messages, last added Wed Aug 08 18:50:48 2001

[Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: OT / Tankless Heating



>> First, resistive heating elements are by definition 100% efficient.
>> Every last KW is converted to BTUs. No gas burner can come close to
>> matching this efficiency.

Eric Jelinski wrote:
> Sorry; try exergy analysis.

What is the definition of "exergy", please? I don't find it in any of my
Physics, Thermodynamics, or Heat Transfer textbooks.

> Exergy analysis takes into account the entropy lost...

Entropy I understand (or, I did when I passed my thermodynamics finals
:-)

I think I get your point. Burning fuel remotely at a power plant to make
electricity, to generate heat on your home is inefficient, too. But I
was simply looking at the microclimate. You pay for X amount of energy
to come into your home. If you want hot water, 100% of the electrical
energy gets converted into heat inside your water heater. If you burn
gas, only a fraction of that energy heats the water; the rest heats the
air, the chimney, etc. You need more BTUs of fuel with gas, but at
current prices, you'll pay less per BTU for gas than for electricity.
-- 
Lee A. Hart                The three laws of thermodynamics (simplified)
814 8th Ave. N.            1. You can't win.
Sartell, MN 56377 USA      2. You can't break even.
leeahart_at_earthlink.net  3. You can't stop playing the game.