REPP logo banner adsolstice ad
site map
Main    Discussion Archives register comment
home
repp
energy and environment
discussion groups
calendar
gem
about us
employment
 
REPP-CREST
1612 K Street, NW
Suite 202
Washington, DC 20006
contact us
discussion groups
efficiency efficiency miropower micropower solar solar wind wind geothermal geo bioenergy bioenergy hydro hydro
Ev Archive for October 2001
1227 messages, last added Wed Oct 31 23:34:35 2001

[Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Jetta Hybrid Conert?



The drive shaft to a rear drive axle will turn about the engine speed in 4th
gear [manual] or Drive [for an automatic]. For most "small" cars this will
be at least 4000 RPM at 60 mph

13 inch tires turn about 950 revolutions per mile, while large [235/75R15]
tires are about 720 revs/mi. The "final drive" ratios are up to 5:1 in a
small engined car, with down to 2:1 for a large V8, without overdrive

I would think the easiest "hybrid" to construct would take a 84-92 Honda
Civic wagon, or a Toyota Tercel, or Corolla wagon. All these were available
as 4WD. [I'm sure there're other similar combinations, Subaru comes to mind
also]

Install the "4wd" rear axle in your 2wd car, it bolts up to the chassis.
Install a small [6.7" ADC for example] motor in the tunnel, and follow it
with a small manual trans, like a pre 76 Volvo. Now depending on how many
batteries, and how you set up the controls, you can go all electric, all IC,
or any combination. Adding 5 electric horsepower, at cruising speed would
REALLY cut fuel consumption.

Obviously this would require "lumps" in the floor/tunnel, but easily
dooable.

Rich

----- Original Message -----
From: "VanDerWal, Peter" <vanderwp@fhu.disa.mil>
To: "'EV List'" <ev@listproc.sjsu.edu>
Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2001 2:32 PM
Subject: Re: Jetta Hybrid Conert?


> I've been thinking about this idea and using the motor-in-the-driveshaft.
>
> I just noticed a potential problem.  Doesn't the drive shaft only spin at
> about 300 rpm at highway speeds?  That's way to slow for most electric
> motors.
> Not an insurmountable problem, but something to consider.
>
>
>