 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| |
REPP-CREST
1612 K Street, NW
Suite 202
Washington, DC 20006
contact us
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
| Ev Archive for January 2002 |
 |
| 1762 messages, last added Wed Jan 30 10:47:27 2002 |
[Date Index][Thread Index]
Re:
I was talking about both. I have seen recirculation in PbA and NiMH. I
have almost no experience with NiCad so I can't say much about those.
PbA are probably the most difficult to keep equal. If the modules are
not all at *exactly* the same temperature, then they don't equalize And
they do not discharge or charge the same. You can watch it on an
amp-hour meter during charge and discharge. If you aren't careful you
can get large differences quickly. Some other chemistries (notably
NiCad) are more tolerant to temperature variation.
Give me a series string to charge any day.
In a perfect world, where all the batteries are at the same temperature,
and the temperature is the same *from one end of the battery to the
other*, then they will likely have no problem equalizing. But this is
hard to do, even with insulation and thermal management.
-Seth
Give me a series string to charge any day. And anything but lead.
"VanDerWal, Peter MSgt" wrote:
>
> Except we are not talking about NiMH packs here we are talking about
> lead-acid, totally different animal.
>
> Lead-Acid packs charged in parallel are automatically at the exact same
> voltage which by definition (for Lead-Acid) means they ARE equalized.
>
> >I have found that paralleling requires more eqaulization than series
> >strings. I have seen recirculating currents in paralleled packs and have
> >heard of it burning up NiMH series/parallel packs.
> >
> >>
> >> Are the batteries normally kept in parallel? If so they will
> automatically
> >> equalize themselves. Equalization charges are only needed or series
> packs.
> >>
- References:
- No Subject
- From: "VanDerWal, Peter MSgt" <vanderwp@fhu.disa.mil>
 |
 |
|