 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| |
REPP-CREST
1612 K Street, NW
Suite 202
Washington, DC 20006
contact us
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
| Ev Archive for January 2002 |
 |
| 1762 messages, last added Wed Jan 30 10:47:22 2002 |
[Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Battery placement
On 15 Jan 2002 at 14:24, et@enterprise.net wrote:
> Batteries as the
> crumplezone is a good idea then? I'm not convinced.
They used a similar trick on the Tropica and Zebra -- a sort of bulkhead of
batteries at the front of the vehicle to improve crashworthiness.
Actually, from what I've heard, batteries crush rather nicely, if messily (valve
regulated batteries usually don't make the mess). And as for putting that
mass out in front where the crash happens -- remember where the inertia is
concentrated. Think about what happens to the nail vs. what happens to
your hand when you swing a hammer or ram it into something.
But -- having all that mass at the ends of the vehicle is not so good for
handling. You may need to decide what kind of safety you want.
David Roden
Akron OH USA
 |
 |
|