REPP logo banner adsolstice ad
site map
Main    Discussion Archives register comment
home
repp
energy and environment
discussion groups
calendar
gem
about us
employment
 
REPP-CREST
1612 K Street, NW
Suite 202
Washington, DC 20006
contact us
discussion groups
efficiency efficiency miropower micropower solar solar wind wind geothermal geo bioenergy bioenergy hydro hydro
Ev Archive for January 2002
1762 messages, last added Wed Jan 30 10:47:18 2002

[Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Battery Cycle Life/Cost



Doing this is very bad for the PbA batteries. 

Deeper discrages and leaving them less than fully charged, even for a
day, are two great ways to kill PbA batteries faster.

-Seth


"M.C. Appleby" wrote:
> 
> You have your trip energy consumption down to a science.   Presuming your
> trips are daily (back to back) - why would you not recharge every two days
> or possibly every three days?  It sounds like even every two days you would
> only be at 50% SOC, but you would have doubled your cycles.
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Mike Chancey" <evtinker@evalbum.com>
> To: <ev@listproc.sjsu.edu>
> Sent: Saturday, January 26, 2002 10:12 PM
> Subject: Battery Cycle Life/Cost
> 
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > I have been wrestling with long term battery life issues,  trying to come
> > up with an affordable way to get my Civic back into regular daily commuter
> > use.  Unfortunately, all I am really discovering is this was the kind of
> > analysis I probably should have done before building the car in the first
> > place.  Here is what I came up with:
> >
> > My commute is roughly 25 miles round trip, but charging is usually
> > available at work.  On weekends I probably put about 20 miles on each day,
> > mostly in little 5 or 10 mile hops, so we are looking at about 165 miles
> > per week, or about 8580 miles per year.  Assuming I recharge once at work
> > and once at home every workday, and at least two charges per day on
> > weekends, that is about 728 cycles per year.  Considering the current
> power
> > consumption of my Civic, roughly 350 watt hours/ mile due to hills and
> > heater use, the 12.5 miles of each workday commute leg uses about 28% of a
> > charge.  So, the battery pack is asked to deliver about 728 cycles at 28%
> > depth of discharge.  The question is, how many cycles can I expect the
> > batteries to deliver before failure?
> >
> > Currently, I have the Civic equipped with a set of 13 used Dynasty group
> 31
> > AGMs (12 volt 100AH).  Due to numerous failures, I have discovered a $20
> > used battery probably really isn't cheap after all.  Before I even
> consider
> > investing in 13 new ones though, I feel it might be wise to look at the
> > chances of them lasting 1 year under my service demands.  I suspect there
> > is little chance of getting a year out of them at all.  If they did last 1
> > year, at roughly $1700 a set, my 8600 miles is going to cost about 20
> cents
> > per mile just for battery replacement cost.  Ouch.  Another alternative
> > must be found.
> >
> > It just might be possible to rebuild the Civic to use 18 8-volt Trojan
> > T-875 flooded batteries, though this would really ruin some of the car's
> > best features.  Now we are looking at a battery cost of about $1200 per
> > set, but due to the greater capacity, the cycle depth would only be about
> > 20%.  For those who have used the T-875, what is the likely cycle life at
> > 20% discharge?  I am guessing it might be possible to get at least 2 years
> > out of them at this shallow cycle, 1456 cycles, or maybe that is too
> > optimistic.  If they would last that long, then the battery cost would be
> > down to about 7 cents per mile, quite a bit more reasonable.
> >
> > Taking this further, dropping down to 18 T-105s would make for pretty lame
> > performance, (from 156 volts to 108) but that would increase capacity and
> > reduce the cycle depth still further, to around 18%.  Battery pack cost
> > would drop to about $900, or 10 cents per mile for 1 year of life, 5 cents
> > per mile if they last for 2 years of service.
> >
> > At this point we are getting so far away from the existing conversion I
> > would probably be better off to buy/build/trade for an EV designed for
> > these more cost effective battery choices.  A 120-144 volt, T-105 equipped
> > pickup would probably be a more appropriate choice for this commute I
> guess.
> >
> > So, what kind of words of wisdom can you folks share with me?  Is there a
> > better alternative?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Mike Chancey,
> > '88 Civic EV
> > Kansas City, Missouri
> > EV List Photo Album at: http://evalbum.com
> > My Electric Car at: http://www.geocities.com/electric_honda
> > Mid-America EAA chapter at: http://maeaa.org
> > Join the EV List at: http://www.madkatz.com/ev/evlist.html
> >
> >
> >