REPP logo banner adsolstice ad
site map
Main    Discussion Archives register comment
home
repp
energy and environment
discussion groups
calendar
gem
about us
employment
 
REPP-CREST
1612 K Street, NW
Suite 202
Washington, DC 20006
contact us
discussion groups
efficiency efficiency miropower micropower solar solar wind wind geothermal geo bioenergy bioenergy hydro hydro
Ev Archive for January 2002
1762 messages, last added Wed Jan 30 10:47:16 2002

[Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Newbie wants grin :(



I would use a orignal chassie with a light weight wood pickup body. My
father, with my help has restored 2 1919 turing body's, a 1929 tudor A and
he is now in the prossses of restoring a 1914 T. My thoughts of useing a
orignal car is because I like the idea of Henry ford's universal car still a
car to consider to drive after 93 years. - Tom
----- Original Message -----
From: "Thomas Shay" <tshay@ix.netcom.com>
To: <ev@listproc.sjsu.edu>
Sent: Monday, January 28, 2002 11:56 PM
Subject: Re: Newbie wants grin :(


> Yes!  Yes!  A Model T electric vehicle sounds good to me.  In
> fact I've sometimes daydreamed about having one.  It would
> certainly be doable and in my never humble opinion would be
> a really fun ride.
>
> I'm something of an expert on Model T's.  I owned a 1926
> roadster pickup in good running condition during  the 1950s.
> I've also collected books and other info about Model T's.
>
> Its engine produced about 20 hp at 1600 rpm and could be
> easily modified to develop more power and speed.  Top
> speed with  a stock engine was about 40 miles per hour.
> It had a two speeds forward, one reverse, planetary
> transmission operated by foot pedals.  One pedal could be
> pushed about half way down for neutral and farther down for
> low gear. A second pedal operated reverse and a third the
> brake.  The brake was a band applied to a drum on the
> transmission output shaft.  A hand lever applied the parking
> brakes on the rear wheels.  For a panic stop, you could turn
> a foot crosswise and push all three pedals at once. Steering
> was frail and sometimes the car would  run off the road
> without warning.  Most had 30 x 3.50 tires ( diameter x
> crossection in inches).
>
> Does this sound like something you'd like to own and drive?
> Probably not, but with some safety related improvements
> like hydraulic brakes, reliable steering, modern lighting,
> turn signals, etc. I would and perhaps a few others might, too.
> The challenge would be to retain as much of the cars original
> character as possible and do so safely.
>
> 48 volts sounds about right for 40 mph top speed.
>
> Tom Shay  1983 Ranger pickup
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Thomas J Webster" <ford1929@frontiernet.net>
> To: <ev@listproc.sjsu.edu>
> Sent: Monday, January 28, 2002 6:16 PM
> Subject: Newbie wants grin :(
>
>
> I have asked people in the past about building a ev. I thank EVery one for
> their time. I put about 30k miles a year on a car. My daily driving is at
> least 40 miles. Sunday I put 125 miles on my car bombing around. (church,
> shopping, work at train museam, quick ride on the local canal path.) I
think
> I could make use of a ev? I have been thinking of building a Ford Model T
> pickup as a pure ev? I grew up with old fords :o) The specs I belive are
> 24hp and 550 lbs for a T chassis and turing body? The stearing is a 13:1
> redution, the main brake is a transmission brake. Don't let any body fool
> you the rear drum brakes arn't worth a darn they are there for parking and
> from keeping it from chaseing you up a tree apon start up. Ive been
thinking
> how about a 48 volt system with a bank of 16 8 volt batteries? I belive
this
> T will turn out to be a nev with extended range? Im trying to shoot for 50
> mile range or better while keeping the orignal speed(?)
> I think this would be a pheasable ev to have for a sunday driver? Anybody
> have any in put? Tom
>
>