Re: patented "free" energy device

["Lawrence Rhodes" <bassoon@jps.net>]

I agree with you on the pollution aspect but if it works it is no different
from wind or solar.  Lawrence Rhodes....
----- Original Message -----
From: <ScuderiaEV@aol.com>
To: <ev@listproc.sjsu.edu>
Sent: Saturday, March 30, 2002 2:03 AM
Subject: Re: patented "free" energy device


> In a message dated 30/03/02 00:24:16 GMT Standard Time, samuzi@kcd.com
> writes:
>
> >>...ok, so now there is a patented device... how can THIS be ignored?<<
>
> It MUST be ignored!
>
> Assuming that such a device is possible it should be banned by
international
> treaty. We in the developed world are very bad at utilising our currently
> 'expensive' (actually very cheap) energy resources. Why insulate your
house
> when you have free energy to heat or cool it to your tastes? Why build
> efficient devices, just build the cheapest ones possible to utilise the
free
> energy. Heat is a pollutant, light is a pollutant. We have to learn to
live
> within our means, not waste time inventing potentially dangerous new
energy
> sources.
>
>
> Paul Compton
> www.sciroccoev.co.uk
>