REPP logo banner adsolstice ad
site map
Main    Discussion Archives register comment
home
repp
energy and environment
discussion groups
calendar
gem
about us
employment
 
REPP-CREST
1612 K Street, NW
Suite 202
Washington, DC 20006
contact us
discussion groups
efficiency efficiency miropower micropower solar solar wind wind geothermal geo bioenergy bioenergy hydro hydro
Ev Archive for May 2002
1384 messages, last added Fri May 31 22:40:07 2002

[Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: GM's inductive EV death wedge



Bruce, everything that I read says that until the
petro-makers take out all sulfur from gasoline, you
won't see ANY petro-FCVs.  It trashes the PEM and
catalyst.
  That also doesn't address why Honda is teaming up
with a company that sells residential hydrogen fueling
systems.  (recent story) I find that issue quite
telling.
  I hate to be pessimistic, but IF there are any
successful terrorist hits, gas skyrockets-- Honda is
poised to make a bundle.

--- Bruce EVangel Parmenter <brucedp@yahoo.com> wrote:
> While there are those that prefer the inductive
> charger to 
> the conductive AVCON standard approved by CARB ...
> but,
> 
> IMHO:
> having two types of public chargers is a GM death
> wedge for
> EVs (divide and conquer).
> 
> I was hoping that with the CARB standard, and GM's
> nil EV
> effort, conductive charging would be totally
> embraced. This
> would make more public chargers possible as the
> installation
> cost would be halved (only one AVCON is now needed,
> not an
> AVCON 'and' a inductive).
> 
> But such is not that case. 
> Since Toyota has agreements with GM (in bed with
> them) and 
> uses the small paddle inductive on the only big 7 EV
> available, the RAV4 EV ... 
> the GM wedge is 'still' in place to let the newbie
> RAV4
> EV drivers demand gen3 small paddle inductive
> chargers be 
> installed in the public.
> 
> I have been approached about a spearhead to fund
> such
> installations. This is not a good idea, and bad for
> all EVs.
> But there is already some gen3 inductive in the
> public
> 
>
http://www.magnecharge.com/documents/SMALL_PADDLE.PDF
> This effort dilutes any effort to create an
> universal 
> EV charging infrastructure.
> 
> Inductive chargers are *ONLY* available for
> inductive
> charging EVs. The more affordable conductive EV
> charging
> is locked out. 
> 
> >From a public EV charging host's perspective,
> keeping 
> their installation costs down, and having the most
> use 
> of the money they spent to put EV charging in, is
> what 
> should be done.
> 
> To install inductive charging, displaces a
> conductive EV
> charger (much like the cuckoo chick that kicks the 
> resident chick out of the nest). This blocks access
> to
> power for all non-inductive charging EVs (ie: in
> Salinas
> their are two gen1 inductive chargers, and no
> conductive
> charging at all. A huge EV charging gap is now
> present
> because of this installation).
> 
> So why the big deal?
> Don't be fooled into thinking inductive EVs are
> going to be
> around forever. GM is down to recycling what EV1
> gen1s they
> have, and I foresee Toyota providing enough RAV4 EVs
> to 
> meet their quota. Then Toyota will stop just like
> what 
> Honda did with their EV plus line. BTW: Honda is
> using the
> EV plus platform for their oil fueled fcvs.
> 
> Inductive EVs are not going to stay.
> GM, Toyota, Nissan, and other inductive signers, are
> going
> to sell oil fueled fcvs. Do not think any automaker
> is 
> going to make grid rechargeable EVs when the oil
> fueled
> fcvs come out.
> 
> These oil fueled fcvs will be touted as EVs and all
> grid 
> rechargeable EVs will be referred to as the
> 'tin-lizzy-s' 
> of a by-gone era. These fcvs and EVs each have their
> niche,
> but the media will be the first to word the death of
> the 
> grid rechargeable EV.
> 
> Once this has happened, only EVs built by
> individuals and
> converters (like what we had before the big boys
> came in and
> faked us out). These EVs will use the more cost
> effective
> conductive EV charging. Getting any inductive
> chargers 
> changed out will be hard, as the public will view
> EVs as
> 'old' and not worth the effort.
> 
> The time to put in public conductive EV charging is
> now. The 
> conductive EV charging standard is universal.
> Inductive EV 
> drivers can easily adapt to AVCON with the available
> adapter.
> Let embrace conductive EV charging and work to help
> inductive
> EVs adapt.
> 
> Watt do you think?
> 
> 
> 
> 
> =====
> ' ____
> ~/__|o\__
> '@----- @'---(=
> . http://geocities.com/brucedp
> . EV List Editor & RE newswires
> . http://egroups.com/group/evangel
> =====
> 
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! - Official partner of 2002 FIFA World Cup
> http://fifaworldcup.yahoo.com
> 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! - Official partner of 2002 FIFA World Cup
http://fifaworldcup.yahoo.com