REPP logo banner adsolstice ad
site map
Main    Discussion Archives register comment
home
repp
energy and environment
discussion groups
calendar
gem
about us
employment
 
REPP-CREST
1612 K Street, NW
Suite 202
Washington, DC 20006
contact us
discussion groups
efficiency efficiency miropower micropower solar solar wind wind geothermal geo bioenergy bioenergy hydro hydro
Ev Archive for May 2002
1384 messages, last added Fri May 31 22:40:07 2002

[Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: cable amp ratings - answers to wrong questions



Thanks Roger for numbers! This is enough info to do the calc 
and decide.

Gauge 4 will serve my needs well - the voltage drop will be 
less than 2V in absolutely worst case (hardest acceleration) -
280A current on 20 feet of cable.

Victor

Roger Stockton wrote:
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Victor Tikhonov [mailto:vtikhono@lsil.com]
> > Sent: May 30, 2002 12:20 PM
> > To: ev@listproc.sjsu.edu
> > Subject: cable amp ratings - answers to wrong questions
> >
> >
> > The trouble with all the current ratings found in these books
> > is that it's pointless.
> 
> [snip]
> 
> > So, who do you think writing these references books?
> 
> The Insulated Cable Engineering Association <http://www.icea.net/> or a
> similar professional organisation, not the hired help at Home Depot
> <GRIN>, helpful though they usually are.
> 
> If you want the exact information you are looking for, you'll probably
> have to browse the ICEA site and purchase the appropriate document.  If
> you are satisfied with information that gives you a reasonable comfort
> factor with using a particular cable somewhat beyond its normal ratings,
> then perhaps the information you can find by searching on "welding
> cable" on General Cable's website is sufficient (look at the technical
> information links associated with any of the products that comes up in
> your search, especially "Installation and Engineering Information").
> 
> For instance, the table of recommended welding cable ampacities is based
> on a 4V drop, 60% duty cycle, and a copper temp of 60C in a 40C ambient.
> With these assumptions in mind:
> 
> #4: 150ft@100A or 100ft@150A
> #2: 250ft@100A or 100ft@200A
> #1: 300ft@100A or 100ft@250A
> 1/0:400ft@100A or 100ft@350A
> 
> (the distance is the maximum total circuit length).  This provides
> information about cable resistance (4V drop in the specified length at
> the specified current) and heating (20C rise in conductor temp at the
> specified current and duty cycle).
> 
> Another table provides ampacity information for 90C conductor temp in a
> 40C ambient for 0-2000V:
> 
>                    Current
> gauge  single conductor  2-conductor
> -----  ----------------  -----------
>  8          83              72
>  6         109              95
>  4         145             127
>  3         167             145
>  2         192             167
>  1         223             191
> 1/0        258             217
> 2/0        298             250
> 3/0        345             286
> 4/0        400             328
> 
> Note that these ampacities are for welding cable with 90C rated
> insulation, and the ampacity correction factors for 90C insulated cable
> is provided as:
> 
>           ampacity
> ambient  correction
> (deg. C)   factor
> -------- ----------
>  10         1.26
>  20         1.18
>  30         1.10
>  40         1.00
>  50         0.90
> 
> Hopefully this information is enough for you to convince yourself if
> what you want to do is likely to be OK or certain to be unsafe.  If not,
> I'm sure you can get the original documents that this info was
> extracted/condensed from through the ICEA... for a price.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Roger.