REPP logo banner adsolstice ad
site map
Main    Discussion Archives register comment
home
repp
energy and environment
discussion groups
calendar
gem
about us
employment
 
REPP-CREST
1612 K Street, NW
Suite 202
Washington, DC 20006
contact us
discussion groups
efficiency efficiency miropower micropower solar solar wind wind geothermal geo bioenergy bioenergy hydro hydro
Ev Archive for May 2002
1384 messages, last added Fri May 31 22:40:06 2002

[Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Battery load testers



Roger,

It does help a lot.  Thanks for taking the time 
to make such a detailed response.

Rob


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Roger Stockton" <rstockton@delta-q.com>
To: <ev@listproc.sjsu.edu>
Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 12:31 PM
Subject: RE: Battery load testers


> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Rob [mailto:westco@jps.net] 
> > Sent: May 31, 2002 11:49 AM
> > To: ev@listproc.sjsu.edu
> > Subject: Battery load testers
> 
> > Now I am looking for a battery load tester to monitor the six 
> > 12-volt batteries in my Bombardier. I would like to be able 
> > to evaluate the batteries, diagnose battery problems and 
> > identify weak batteries in the string.  After doing some 
> > reading, it appears that the conductance meters made by 
> > Midtronics were easier to use and more accurate than a 
> > standard load tester (I think).  So I began to check out a 
> > PBT-100 ($109) and a Micro 400
> > ($349) testers, rather than buy a simple Electronic 
> > Specialities Digital 120 AMP Battery Load tester ($45).
> > 
> > Someone out there must know a lot more about battery load 
> > testers.  I would appreciate any advice.
> 
> I think it depends what sort of information you hope to get about the
> pack.  A traditional carbon pile load tester tells you about the ability
> of the battery to sustain a peak load (i.e. measure how many amps the
> battery can source when loaded such that its terminal voltage sags to
> ~9V).
> 
> The Midtronics tester (which I believe is what I had the opportunity to
> use when pit crewing for Rod Wilde on the Maniac Mazda a few Woodburns
> ago) essentially gives you the same information, but does so by
> measuring the battery impedance.  When you connect it to the battery it
> will advise you if the battery needs to be charged before testing.  If
> it decides the battery is sufficiently charged to test, it will proceed
> to provide you with an estimate of the battery's cranking amp capability
> (don't recall if it is CCA or CA).  I believe you can tell the unit what
> your minimum acceptable value is so it will deliver a PASS/FAIL verdict
> as well; if not, you must decide if the value represents a healthy,
> weak, or defective battery yourself.
> 
> I don't believe either of these tells you much about the capacity of the
> battery, which may well be the most important thing for an on-road EV.
> 
> If your load tester is sufficiently beefy, you could use it to perform a
> capacity test by dialing it up to a suitable load current and monitor
> how long it takes for the battery voltage to fall to some level.  If you
> want to be able to compare the result directly to the manufacturer's
> specifications, then you are pushed into performing a relatively deep
> discharge, however, if you want to monitor the relative health of the
> pack, you could standardise on a shallower discharge at a convenient
> rate (e.g. time to 1.90Vpc @ 50A) and keep a journal so that trends over
> time would become obvious and you could immediately identify a battery
> on its way out based on its differing behaviour in the periodic (e.g.
> monthly) test.
> 
> Hope this helps,
> 
> Roger.
>