REPP logo banner adsolstice ad
site map
Main    Discussion Archives register comment
home
repp
energy and environment
discussion groups
calendar
gem
about us
employment
 
REPP-CREST
1612 K Street, NW
Suite 202
Washington, DC 20006
contact us
discussion groups
efficiency efficiency miropower micropower solar solar wind wind geothermal geo bioenergy bioenergy hydro hydro
Ev Archive for May 2002
1384 messages, last added Fri May 31 22:40:06 2002

[Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: OT :cable amp ratings - answers to wrong questions



That's because in those larger sizes it's an actual measure of area 
in circular mils or in this case thousands of circular mils (kcmils). 
One of those technical pdfs from General Cable that were mentioned a 
couple of days ago was a conversion chart, and it says a circular mil 
= 7.854x10^-7 sqare inches. (1 mil=.0001 in. and it looks like a 
circle 1 mil in dia. is 1 cmil in area.)

>  > -----Original Message-----
>>  From: Victor Tikhonov [mailto:vtikhono@lsil.com]
>>  Sent: May 31, 2002 4:48 PM
>>  To: ev@listproc.sjsu.edu
>>  Subject: Re: OT :cable amp ratings - answers to wrong questions
>
>>  - Wire size - larger number - smaller diameter (gets even worse -
>>  it goes through a minimum and gors up again: 4, 2, 1, 1/0,
>>  2/0, 4/0, ...
>
>Of course, 1/0, 2/0, 3/0, 4/0 is shorthand for 0, 00, 000, and 0000, so
>while the shorthand makes it look worse, the reality isn't quite so bad.
>
>Once you get into ~real~ cable, the sizes are more sensible, even
>without metric, and there really is a reversal:
>
>8, 4, 2, 1, 0, 00, 000, 0000, 250kcmil, 300kcmil, 350kcmil, 400kcmil,
>etc.
>
>in ascending order of physical size.
>
>Cheers,
>
>Roger.


-- 
Michael Haseltine -- Tucson, Arizona
Subvert the dominant paradigm, drive electric!