REPP logo banner adsolstice ad
site map
Main    Discussion Archives register comment
home
repp
energy and environment
discussion groups
calendar
gem
about us
employment
 
REPP-CREST
1612 K Street, NW
Suite 202
Washington, DC 20006
contact us
discussion groups
efficiency efficiency miropower micropower solar solar wind wind geothermal geo bioenergy bioenergy hydro hydro
Ev Archive for August 2002
1302 messages, last added Sat Aug 31 23:53:58 2002

[Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Electric DeLorean not form email



I got one to .  If he is working for the gas people he has done a fine job
of keeping me from working on my EV but so have all his Gen on a wheel
buddies .  I will eat that crow, feathers and all if it works ,if not he has
wasted or time .I like that at least we are getting some hints ,.
I put your idea on my bs list  -----
From: "Seth Murray" <sethm@WPI.EDU>
To: "EV List" <ev@listproc.sjsu.edu>
Sent: Friday, August 30, 2002 6:19 AM
Subject: Fwd: Electric DeLorean not form email


> Hi All -
>
> Sorry to bring this all up again, but yesterday I replied to Doug
> Littlefield's form email and he replied to that with the following
> message, which is not a form letter as far as I can tell (but just as
> interesting as the last one!):
>
> Begin forwarded message:
>
> > From: "Doug Littlefield" <dougl@pshift.com>
> > Date: Fri Aug 30, 2002  8:45:28  AM US/Eastern
> > To: "Seth Murray" <sethm@WPI.EDU>
> > Subject: Re: Electric DeLorean/Self-recharching
> >
> > Good Day Seth:
> >
> > Thanks for your message, most of it was a pleasure to see.
> >
> > One question, how can all of you use that overworked phrase perpetual
> > motion ?
> > We don't claim that, we don't believe in that ... for your information
> > I fully expect
> > a change of batteries will be necessary as all batteries have a useful
> > life as
> > regards their ability to hold a charge at all ... no matter where that
> > charge comes
> > from. With the cheap batteries we are using ($56 at Wal-Mart) I would
> > think, at
> > best, a change every couple of years might be necessary.
> >
> > But that aside, think of this ... what if this device can assist even
> > only to the degree that
> > a vehicle can drive, say 800 miles (that number is pulled out of the
> > air for this discussion
> > only) without plugging in .... in your estimation would that not be
> > significant for the
> > advancement of EV utilization ?
> >
> > As for some of the charges, not necessarily from you, that we are
> > frauds and (or)
> > scam artists...I'd buy that "potential" IF we wanted anything from any
> > of you ... we
> > want no money, we will not charge admission and no one can invest in
> > us if they
> > wanted to...we will sell no "kits" and we offer no licenses.
> >
> > What we "want" is for as many people as will come to see us succeed,
> > or fail, on the merits
> > of what we truly believe in. BTW it's taken 17 years, many failures
> > and a great deal of our
> > own money to get to next Saturday).
> >
> > I truly hope we "amaze" you ! (I know that comes as no surprise !!)
> >
> > Sincerely,
> >
> > Doug Littlefield
>
> Sounds to me like Doug doesn't understand the phrase "perpetual
> motion," how batteries work, or how much energy it takes to drive 800
> miles.  Here's an interesting thought though - what if, like the
> DeLorean in Back to the Future, this thing had a small nuclear reactor
> on board which would have a enough fuel in it to last the life of the
> car ( "1.21 gigawatts!" )?  I know that idea sounds crazy, but my guess
> is that they do have SOME sort of onboard energy-producing device which
> needs "no" fuel (ie, has it's own supply which will last a while).
> Just a thought.
>
> -Seth
>
>
> --
> QUESTION INTERNAL COMBUSTION
>
> http://members.fortunecity.com/electricityboy
> http://www.austinev.org/evalbum/387.html
>
>