REPP logo banner adsolstice ad
site map
Main    Discussion Archives register comment
home
repp
energy and environment
discussion groups
calendar
gem
about us
employment
 
REPP-CREST
1612 K Street, NW
Suite 202
Washington, DC 20006
contact us
discussion groups
efficiency efficiency miropower micropower solar solar wind wind geothermal geo bioenergy bioenergy hydro hydro
Ev Archive for August 2002
1302 messages, last added Sat Aug 31 23:53:57 2002

[Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: one motor per wheel, sprung




Lee wrote:

> Why would they?

Well, as I previously mentioned, because a direct connection is different than being connected through a differential and/or 
transmission. 


> Isn't it the wheel that ultimately defines the maximum torque? It slips
> if the torque is too high, regardless of whether the torque is coming
> directly from a wheel motor or thru a gearbox. 

I see. I wasn't referring to sheer torque forces being the problem, but rather the day in and day out repeated application and 
disapplication of power without the benefit of a any slack from a differential or buffer of a transmission.

I had some experience with this involving CV joints directly between a PTO and the load in a manufacturing application. There was a high 
failure rate with the initial use of sedan-sized units, and they had to move up to truck-sized units. This involved less HP and much less 
RPM than an automotive application.

So, four inboard motors with CV joints would work if they were up-sized, but then you would have more weight spinning at high RPMs, 
which would then require more precise balancing.


Vince