 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| |
REPP-CREST
1612 K Street, NW
Suite 202
Washington, DC 20006
contact us
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
| Ev Archive for August 2002 |
 |
| 1302 messages, last added Sat Aug 31 23:53:57 2002 |
[Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: one motor per wheel, sprung
Lee wrote:
> Why would they?
Well, as I previously mentioned, because a direct connection is different than being connected through a differential and/or
transmission.
> Isn't it the wheel that ultimately defines the maximum torque? It slips
> if the torque is too high, regardless of whether the torque is coming
> directly from a wheel motor or thru a gearbox.
I see. I wasn't referring to sheer torque forces being the problem, but rather the day in and day out repeated application and
disapplication of power without the benefit of a any slack from a differential or buffer of a transmission.
I had some experience with this involving CV joints directly between a PTO and the load in a manufacturing application. There was a high
failure rate with the initial use of sedan-sized units, and they had to move up to truck-sized units. This involved less HP and much less
RPM than an automotive application.
So, four inboard motors with CV joints would work if they were up-sized, but then you would have more weight spinning at high RPMs,
which would then require more precise balancing.
Vince
 |
 |
|