 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| |
REPP-CREST
1612 K Street, NW
Suite 202
Washington, DC 20006
contact us
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
| Gasification Archive for April 2000 |
 |
| 78 messages, last added Tue Nov 26 17:16:54 2002 |
[Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GAS-L: Internal Combustion with Producer Gas
Dear Robert Luis et al:
Good points about compression pressure vs compression ratio.
I would presume that producer gas gives lower compression pressures at high
compression than comparable gasoline, propane or methane fuels at the same CR
because the fuel charge is more dilute and the flame temperature is down.
Therefore, increasing CR with producer gas to regain lost power should be OK,
but not to exceed original design specs.
If not, please warn me....
Yours, TOM REED
In a message dated 4/27/00 9:15:50 AM Mountain Daylight Time,
rabello@uniserve.com writes:
<<
Mike Norris wrote:
> If as you say the knock limit of producer gas is 150, then one could
> increase the compression
> ratio by reducing the volume of the combustion chamber at
> top-dead-center.
Your idea is essentially correct, but I'd like to introduce a
caveat.
Compression pressure is more significant than compression ratio,
strictly
speaking. Changing valve timing, ignition advance, engine rpm or the
density of the intake charge can impact compression pressure. Most
automobile engines have been designed to tolerate no more than about 150
psi. Exceeding this can lead to internal component damage.
I have experience in this regard with my most recent propane
conversion. I built a small block Chevy with a static 10:1 compression
ratio. When I first fired the engine, it sounded like a diesel!
Subsequent
checking of its compression pressure revealed a range from 180 psi on
the
lowest cylinder to 205 on the highest.
The engine ran very well, but suffered from detonation at part
throttle. I installed water injection to remedy this problem, and it
worked, but some water condensed in one of the cylinders. The next day
when
I tried to start the car, that water could not compress and I ended up
with a bent connecting rod! Inspection after tear-down revealed fairly
heavy wear on the main bearings. The engine lasted about 35 000
kilometers and probably wouldn't have gone too much further before
experiencing bearing failure.
The moral of this sad story is this: Most passenger car engines are
not designed for high compression pressures. You're better off with a
diesel if you increase compression pressures beyond 150 psi.
robert luis rabello >>
The Gasification List is sponsored by
USDOE BioPower Program http://www.eren.doe.gov/biopower/
and PRM Energy Systems http://www.prmenergy.com
Other Sponsors, Archives and Information
http://www.crest.org/renewables/gasification-list-archive
http://solstice.crest.org/renewables/biomass-info/gasref.shtml
http://www.crest.org/renewables/biomass-info/
http://www.crest.org/renewables/biomass-info/carbon.shtml
 |
 |
|