 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| |
REPP-CREST
1612 K Street, NW
Suite 202
Washington, DC 20006
contact us
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
| Gasification Archive for February 2001 |
 |
| 179 messages, last added Tue Nov 26 17:17:37 2002 |
[Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: FW: GAS-L: Drying
- To: Crest Gasification List <gasification@crest.org>
- Subject: RE: FW: GAS-L: Drying
- From: Weststeijn A <A.Weststeijn@epz.nl>
- Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2001 22:26:14 +0100
- Cc: "'= Peter Singfield'" <snkm@btl.net>
- Delivered-To: mailing list gasification@crest.org
- Mailing-List: contact gasification-help@crest.org; run by ezmlm
- Reply-To: Crest Gasification List <gasification@crest.org>
Hi Peter,
> Peter Singfield[SMTP:snkm@btl.net]
> 18 februari 2001 21:10
>
Peter writes:
> Check out cascading, vacuum distillation -- right in your area -- France.
> www.entropie.com\En\default2.htm
>
You are referring to vacuum flash evaporation used for making drinking water
quality.
We operated such an (early) plant between approx 1970 and 1990 and know
about the costs involved. Later on these plants were built in the
Middle-East and elsewhere.
So we are in a position to compare with membrane technology.
> Certainly beats "membrane" technology -- and especially when you have a
> little bit of waste heat at hand.
>
Membrane technology made big strides forward lately.
In fact, the older vacuum flash plant above (not in our realm anymore) is
currently being replaced by a membrane plant (by others).
Client being a hugh US chemical international, so the bucks do count!
By the way: you did not answer my question:
> Considered too radical by whom?
>
with respect to your statement:
> We are only allowed to fine tune what we have at present -- even putting
> an economizer in the stack is considered to "radical".
>
Who is holding whom back if financial conditions are met?
best regards,
Andries
 |
 |
|