REPP logo banner adsolstice ad
site map
Google Search REPP WWW register comment
home
repp
energy and environment
discussion groups
calendar
gem
about us
employment
 
REPP-CREST
1612 K Street, NW
Suite 202
Washington, DC 20006
contact us
discussion groups
efficiencyefficiency hydrogenhydrogen solarsolar windwind geothermalgeothermal bioenergybioenergy hydrohydro policypolicy
Gasification Archive for February 2001
179 messages, last added Tue Nov 26 17:17:37 2002

[Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: GAS-L: Wasted throttle power



Dear Tom
 
In a standar Otto Cycle, power and speed control is attained by varying the fuel addition. Same as the Diesel Cycle. However, to do this, because fuel is premixed with air, one has to reduce the air also. The consequence of htis is that the cylinder does not get a full volumetric charge, and as a consequence the absolute compression ratio is reduced. Then, the efficiency drops.
 
The conceptually simple way to make an Otto Cycle engine efficient over a range of loads is to vary the engine displacement, rather than keeping displacement constant, and varying the compression ratio. One way to do this is disable/enable cylinders in a multi cylinder engine, while keeping fuel/ flow to the operating cylinders constant.
 
This conceptual solution has ugly practicalities, but thats the only way I can see it working.  
 
Kindest regards,
 
Kevin Chisholm
-----Original Message-----
From: Reedtb2@cs.com [mailto:Reedtb2@cs.com]
Sent: Monday, February 19, 2001 10:32 AM
To: gasification@crest.org
Subject: GAS-L: Wasted throttle power

Dear Prof. Parikh and All:

While looking for new sources of energy for the next millenium, please
consider "wasted throttle power".  

1)  Spark and diesel engines are both "hot air machines" (with <= 6% fuel
thrown in to heat the air).

2)  The diesel engine does not throttle the air - only the fuel, so there are
no "throttle losses" and the diesel burns from lean to very lean and so is
very efficient.

3)  The spark ignited engine requires a close to stoichiometric mixture, so
must throttle the mixture from near atmospheric to very small values to
control power.  The butterfly throttle is a MAJOR waster of power.

4)  Can't one of you clever gals or guys invent a "working throttle" (like
the exhaust turbo) to recycle some of this energy?  How much energy is it to
take the mixture from a power producing near atmospheric pressure to a power
wasting 25 inches vacuum?  (Probably related to R ln (p2/p1)).

Too busy to figure it myself...

Cheers,     TOM REED




In a message dated 2/19/01 2:34:23 AM Mountain Standard Time,
A.Weststeijn@epz.nl writes:




Hi Peter,



Dr. Thomas B. Reed, President, The Biomass Energy Foundation, 1810 Smith Rd.,
Golden, CO 80401
Email reedtb2@cs.com; www.woodgas.com; 303 278 0558 home; 303 278 0560 Fax

Dr. Thomas B. Reed, Principal Scientist,
The Community Power Corporation, Reedtb2@cs.com; www.gocpc.com;  303 278 0558