 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| |
REPP-CREST
1612 K Street, NW
Suite 202
Washington, DC 20006
contact us
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
| Gasification Archive for February 2001 |
 |
| 179 messages, last added Tue Nov 26 17:17:37 2002 |
[Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: GAS-L: Wasted throttle power
- To: gasification@crest.org
- Subject: RE: GAS-L: Wasted throttle power
- From: Peter Singfield <snkm@btl.net>
- Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2001 11:52:19 -0600
- Delivered-To: mailing list gasification@crest.org
- Mailing-List: contact gasification-help@crest.org; run by ezmlm
You can do like Cadillac once did -- simply turn cylinders off an on.
Peter / Belize
At 11:27 AM 2/19/2001 -0400, you wrote:
>>>>
Dear Tom In a standar Otto Cycle, power and speed control is attained by
varying the fuel addition. Same as the Diesel Cycle. However, to do this,
because fuel is premixed with air, one has to reduce the air also. The
consequence of htis is that the cylinder does not get a full volumetric
charge, and as a consequence the absolute compression ratio is reduced.
Then, the efficiency drops. The conceptually simple way to make an Otto
Cycle engine efficient over a range of loads is to vary the engine
displacement, rather than keeping displacement constant, and varying the
compression ratio. One way to do this is disable/enable cylinders in a
multi cylinder engine, while keeping fuel/ flow to the operating cylinders
constant. This conceptual solution has ugly practicalities, but thats the
only way I can see it working. Kindest regards, Kevin Chisholm
size=2>-----Original Message-----
From: Reedtb2@cs.com [mailto:Reedtb2@cs.com]
Sent: Monday, February 19, 2001 10:32 AM
To: gasification@crest.org
Subject: GAS-L: Wasted throttle power
Dear Prof. Parikh and All:
While looking for new sources of energy for the next millenium, please
consider "wasted throttle power".
1) Spark and diesel engines are both "hot air machines" (with <= 6% fuel
thrown in to heat the air).
2) The diesel engine does not throttle the air - only the fuel, so
there are
no "throttle losses" and the diesel burns from lean to very lean and so
is
very efficient.
3) The spark ignited engine requires a close to stoichiometric mixture,
so
must throttle the mixture from near atmospheric to very small values to
control power. The butterfly throttle is a MAJOR waster of power.
4) Can't one of you clever gals or guys invent a "working throttle" (like
the exhaust turbo) to recycle some of this energy? How much energy is
it to
take the mixture from a power producing near atmospheric pressure to a
power
wasting 25 inches vacuum? (Probably related to R ln (p2/p1)).
Too busy to figure it myself...
Cheers, TOM REED
In a message dated 2/19/01 2:34:23 AM Mountain Standard Time,
A.Weststeijn@epz.nl writes:
FAMILY="SANSSERIF">
TYPE="CITE">
Hi Peter,
face=Arial lang=0 size=3 FAMILY="SANSSERIF">
face=Arial lang=0 size=2 FAMILY="SANSSERIF">Dr. Thomas B. Reed,
President, The Biomass Energy Foundation, 1810 Smith Rd.,
Golden, CO 80401
Email reedtb2@cs.com; www.woodgas.com; 303 278 0558 home; 303 278 0560
Fax
Dr. Thomas B. Reed, Principal Scientist,
The Community Power Corporation, Reedtb2@cs.com; www.gocpc.com; 303 278
0558
 |
 |
|