REPP logo banner adsolstice ad
site map
Google Search REPP WWW register comment
home
repp
energy and environment
discussion groups
calendar
gem
about us
employment
 
REPP-CREST
1612 K Street, NW
Suite 202
Washington, DC 20006
contact us
discussion groups
efficiencyefficiency hydrogenhydrogen solarsolar windwind geothermalgeothermal bioenergybioenergy hydrohydro policypolicy
Gasification Archive for November 2001
156 messages, last added Tue Nov 26 17:18:06 2002

[Date Index][Thread Index]

GAS-L: Gasifier questions



Dear Tim

----- Original Message -----
From: "Tim Bollman" <
tbollman@twlakes.net>
To: <
gasification@crest.org>
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 4:50 PM
Subject: GAS-L: Questions about gasification


All,

I anticipate building a gasifier system in the not too distant future and
two questions keep arising about my "mental" plans.

1) Virtually all gasifirer designs I have seen have been cyndrillical or
drum shaped.

>Is this due to availability of drum shaped containers, to avoid bio mass
"bridging", ease of construction, other, or all the above?

Yes, yes, yes, yes, yes, and yes.

One of the "other considerations" is gas flow....... hard to get gas to flow
to the corners.

>I envision a retangular hopper with a triangular grate/reaction/pyrolisis
chamber. Am I crazy?

Why would you want to do this?
 
I am basing my design on a very effective wood fired boiler that I have seen (Menonite made).
The fire box was deep and wide and tilted down to a point in the back of the stove. This made it easy to load and obviated bridging problems. The design I envision would also allow differing sizes of "hoppers" to be used, to allow for system size adjustment etc.
 
I don't deal with circular fabrication as well as I do with flat surfaces and planes. I am a structural guy...no longer mechanical....sigh. Additionaly, my "shop" isn't such that I can undertake anything but the most rudimentary fabrication.
 
 As to air flow at the corners, I anticipate feeding the process with a standard size black iron pipe cast into a ferro concrete grate, said pipes being fed via a double manifold. I will position said oxygen supplies to minimize the "corner" effect.  I also intend to stagger the feed pipes side to side to minimize any areas in the reaction area that might result in less than maximum reaction.
 
I am still analysing the description of the Imbert gasifier in my copy of  "Handbook of Biomass Downdraft Gasifier Engine sytems". I suspect the final layout and design will only be determined by experience with a working gasifier.
 
2) Rather than using the gas at the time of generation, I plan to compress
it (similar to LPG) for use later or as needed.

> Is there compelling reasons for NOT doing this?

Yes, indeed. The capital, energy, and maintenance costs associated with a
compressor.
OK, here's the deal. I am off-grid. Supplying electricity for a fan is a "no-go" situation for me. Additionally, I intend to filter my gas with a wet system filter (gravity fed water-bath over charcoal filter). After filtration, I intend to further cool my gas, as well as precipitate any remaining tar in my gas with a counter weighted "accumulator" surrounded by a water bath/cooler/seal.
 
It is my intention to size the accumulator and hopper such that the fuel in the hopper is close to exhausion at about the time that the accumulator reaches capacity. The counter weights on the accumulator will be sized to provide the neccessary draft thru the reaction chamber......thus no electricity required for operation.
 
The compressor  would, in this case consist of a suitable small horse power engine that would be run at the begining of the gasification cycle to compress the gas into storage tanks, return the accumulator to it's empty position and fill the cooling water gravity feed tank all at once. Said engine to be fed by the already produced=and coloed gas. All the above being done as the hopper was being re-filled, the pre-drier filled, the fire restarted, flaring off the "pre-gas".......etc. 

>I anticipate compressing to 180 psi at ambient temps (30 to 90 F) in order
to avail myself of commonly available LPG valves, tanks, fittings and
gauges.

180 psi isn't much. You will need very large tankage to store a decent
amount of energy.

 As noted above, my intent is to use readily available  "off the shelf" components to minimize costs. My LPG guy tells me their systems are rated at 180 psi.
What do you want ot use the gas to accomplish?
 
In the first incarnation of this system, I would like to replace the 5 gallons of gasoline that I purchase each week for electrical generation. I would like the system to operate well enough that I could store enough "energy" for a week or two in advance. LPG storage tanks are relatively cheap, if you have sufficent gas of decent quality to fill them with.
 
Eventually, I would like this system to supplant all my fuel needs for 2 trucks, 2 tractors, 2 generators, and my wifes' car.........and if I can replace my wood stove with a thermostatically controlled natural gas heater run on wood gas......GREAT.
 
Even better, if I can run my cook range, water heater and propane refrigerator, I will be completely energy independant......VERY COOL. 

Thanks again
 
Tim

Kindest regards,

Kevin CHisholm

Thanks for any responses in advance.

Tim Bollman


-
Gasification List Archives:
http://www.crest.org/discussion/gasification/current/

Gasification List Moderator:
Tom Reed, Biomass Energy Foundation, Reedtb2@cs.com
www.webpan.com/BEF
List-Post: <mailto:gasification@crest.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gasification-help@crest.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gasification-unsubscribe@crest.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gasification-subscribe@crest.org>

Sponsor the Gasification List: http://www.crest.org/discuss3.html
-
Other Gasification Events and Information:
http://www.bioenergy2002.org
http://solstice.crest.org/renewables/biomass-info/gasref.shtml
http://solstice.crest.org/renewables/biomass-info/
____________________________________________________
 IncrediMail - Email has finally evolved - Click Here