REPP logo banner adsolstice ad
site map
Google Search REPP WWW register comment
home
repp
energy and environment
discussion groups
calendar
gem
about us
employment
 
REPP-CREST
1612 K Street, NW
Suite 202
Washington, DC 20006
contact us
discussion groups
efficiencyefficiency hydrogenhydrogen solarsolar windwind geothermalgeothermal bioenergybioenergy hydrohydro policypolicy
Gasification Archive for January 2002
100 messages, last added Tue Nov 26 17:18:12 2002

[Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: GAS-L: Fuel Cells -- ethanol -- reforming natural gas



On Tue, 22 Jan 2002 19:21:47 -0800 (PST)
jerry dycus <jerry5335@yahoo.com> wrote in
<20020123032147.32025.qmail@web14008.mail.yahoo.com>:

>       Hi Joacim and All,
> --- Joacim Persson <joacim@ymex.net> wrote:
> > On Mon, 14 Jan 2002, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
> > 
> > ...
> > > ..at 25-35% efficiency, the gasoline and diesel
> > engines _are_ obsolete.
>      While  these can develop this kind of eff in
> steady state running in a car the eff is more like 7%
> of the fuel's energy actually drives the rear wheels. 
>      A good EV can get up to 20% eff from the power
> plant fuel to the road. 

..with todays power plants, agreed. 

> > 
> > Ehum. Not comparable. A flywheel is a storage of
> > (close to?) 100% pure work.
> > Ottos and diesels are heat motors. Heat is never
> > 100% work, you know. ;)
>       But where does the flywheels energy come from?

..from "my" coal + MSW fired gasifier fuel cell loop, 
eventually at 93%.

> What eff was it made at? While flywheels sound good
> they have many problems in a car.
> > 
> > Beats a chemical battery though?
>     Not in eff or cost. A lead/acid battery can charge
> 
> elect in /elect out at 95/ 97% eff and with a rundown

..what???  Usually I hear around 60-70%.

> of 4 months while the flywheel will lose all it's
> energy in 2 or 3 days and would be lucky to get 92%
> eff not counting where the electricity comes from to

..I use Jack Bitterly's flywheels as my baseline.  96%.

> charge both. 


..combining these with a superconducting grid, and a flywheel 
"gas" station, ->  .93 * .96 * .96 = .857  
This of course disregards mining and (coal and MSW) transport losses.


-- 
..med vennlig hilsen = with kind regards from Arnt...  ;-)

  Scenarios always come in sets of three:
  best case, worst case, and just in case.

-
Gasification List Archives:
http://www.crest.org/discussion/gasification/current/

Gasification List Moderator:
Tom Reed, Biomass Energy Foundation,  Reedtb2@cs.com
www.webpan.com/BEF
List-Post: <mailto:gasification@crest.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gasification-help@crest.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gasification-unsubscribe@crest.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gasification-subscribe@crest.org>

Sponsor the Gasification List: http://www.crest.org/discuss3.html
-
Other Gasification Events and Information:
http://www.bioenergy2002.org
http://solstice.crest.org/renewables/biomass-info/gasref.shtml
http://solstice.crest.org/renewables/biomass-info/