GAS-L: Re: Peter Einstein Singfield was Re: Gasification terminology

[Peter Singfield <snkm@btl.net>]

Bruno --

>Please tel us about your last hint, how exactly do you turn excess CO into
H2 ?

You must have been off list the past year??

Search the archives -- it was studied and "presented" in great detail --
maybe 6 months ago??

Catalytic heaters -- tin metal baths -- steam reforming raw biomass -- the
whole business. With clear references to "existing" technology.

Don't expect me to lay it all out in detail to convince you -- research it
yourself!! Go to this lists archives.

Producing a good yield of pure H2 from biomass at high efficiency is real.

Fuel cells?? You probably know more about them than I do ---

But the best -- highest efficiencies -- operate on pure H2

Then there is also just getting the right ratio of H2 and CO for the purest
possible synthesis gas for further products. All part of this technology.

Should we ignore this technology just because people prefer to be blind to
it??

That is the real question ---

>and you'll be the next Bill Gate§ if you pattent it :-))  LOL

I have a patent -- search "peter singfield" at the US patent office.
Believe me -- a waste of time and money. As Arnt and friends are about to
discover.

I can't see myself compared to Einstein -- he was a theorist -- better
comparison would be Edison -- he was an innovator.

Peter


At 03:47 AM 1/31/2002 +0100, you wrote:
> > In a message dated 1/28/02 4:24:13 AM, Harry.Parker@ttu.edu writes:
> > Hello all,
> > We have to get our terms clarified. To me gasification is the reaction 
>of carbon with steam,
> > but some of you may call it the water gas shift reaction too.
> >          C + H2O <---> CO + H2
> > This reaction is highly endothermic since you are "unburning" water.
> > The combustible hydrocarbons you get from organic matter pyrolysis are a 
>bonus.
>~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
>>At 07:31 30/01/2002 -0600, Peter Singfield wrote:
>>Dear Harry, Tom and All:
>>
>>Regarding your statement:
>> >The above endothermic reaction results in real processes
>> >being rather inefficient, usually about 50%.
>>--snip--
>>
>>You can't simply make energy disappear -- or get lost.
>>
>>One last hint -- the CO in the mentioned H2 reaction products is utilized
>>to operate the catalytic converter -- to fuel to reaction.
>>
>>Also -- you can straight convert excess CO from the above to H2
>>using the tin liquid metal bath -- with extremely high efficiencies.
>>If they can do all this in a car -- certainly they can do it in a coal
>>fueled power plant??
>>Peter Singfield / Belize
>
>~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>Dear Peter,
>
>Please tel us about your last hint, how exactly do you turn excess CO into
H2 ?
>If you realy can do that, you can make from every (sustainable ) hydrocarbon
>source the cleanest Hydrogen wich will stop the greenhouse gas emissions
>of CO2 worldwide; and you'll be the next Bill Gate§ if you pattent it :-))
 LOL
>
>Now serious, I realy like to know, how coal and biomasse can be used in a car
>to power a fuelcell, since you know a lot more about fuelcells than about 
>chemistry :-)
>
>sorry about the yoke, couldnt help it,
>just a chemist,
>Bruno Meersman
>
>Reply's to BrunoM1@yucom.be
>
>

-
Gasification List Archives:
http://www.crest.org/discussion/gasification/current/

Gasification List Moderator:
Tom Reed, Biomass Energy Foundation,  Reedtb2@cs.com
www.webpan.com/BEF
List-Post: <mailto:gasification@crest.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gasification-help@crest.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gasification-unsubscribe@crest.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gasification-subscribe@crest.org>

Sponsor the Gasification List: http://www.crest.org/discuss3.html
-
Other Gasification Events and Information:
http://www.bioenergy2002.org
http://solstice.crest.org/renewables/biomass-info/gasref.shtml
http://solstice.crest.org/renewables/biomass-info/