 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| |
REPP-CREST
1612 K Street, NW
Suite 202
Washington, DC 20006
contact us
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
| Gasification Archive for February 2002 |
 |
| 42 messages, last added Tue Nov 26 17:18:14 2002 |
[Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GAS-L: maximum pressure
In a message dated 02-02-01 14:25:07 EST, LINVENT@aol.com writes:
<< The major benefit to high pressure is not having to compress the gas to
feed into a turbine which operates at 150-350 psi. Compressing the gas after
gasification is a significant parasitic load. >>
I am still trying to understand the advantages of working under pressure
in a hot gasifier. Reflections :
- compressing the gas after gasification requires energy, OK. But so does
the compression of air before gasification. Slightly smaller volume maybe
but then consider the unavoidable leaks ...
- I keep thinking something is missing in the reasoning. Or why would
people spend so much money in Hawai to replace a stupid compressor
after the gasifier ?
- In a first message, I wrote that Le Chatelier was pushing the reactions
the wrong way : when pressure goes up, the reactions are displaced
towards the least volume. Ex : 2CO <-> CO2 + C goes to the right.
Not exactly what we want.
Well, actually, I didn't get the whole picture : we can also see something
like C + 2H2 <-> CH4 which is favored by an increase in pressure.
Generating methane is quite exciting !
I ran a quick thermodynamic model with a 20% moisture wood at 800°C.
No methane at atmospheric pressure of course, it is largely decomposed
above 600°C. But at 15 bar, I had about 5% in the gas. (Could not go any
higher as the wood began leaving an important carbon residue in the
vessel. Need more moisture to increase the pressure.)
Interestingly enough, the yield increases slowly with the pressure.
(I mean the ratio of heat capacity in the gas vs. the wood used.)
- If we take the gas produced at one atmosphere and we compress it
to 15 bar at the same temperature, we get approximately the same
composition as the gas produced at 15 bar in the furnace. This latter
operation is of course a lot easier. (A heat exchanger could cool down
the gas before the blower and reheat it after, to soften the cost.)
Ain't that fun, to run a furnace on paper ?
We can still burn the paper when we are done :-)
Still suspicious : rich idea in hiding or mad scientist ?
Jacques Proot
(metallurgical process - and gas amateur after hours)
-
Gasification List Archives:
http://www.crest.org/discussion/gasification/current/
Gasification List Moderator:
Tom Reed, Biomass Energy Foundation, Reedtb2@cs.com
www.webpan.com/BEF
List-Post: <mailto:gasification@crest.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gasification-help@crest.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gasification-unsubscribe@crest.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gasification-subscribe@crest.org>
Sponsor the Gasification List: http://www.crest.org/discuss3.html
-
Other Gasification Events and Information:
http://www.bioenergy2002.org
http://solstice.crest.org/renewables/biomass-info/gasref.shtml
http://solstice.crest.org/renewables/biomass-info/
 |
 |
|