REPP logo banner adsolstice ad
site map
Google Search REPP WWW register comment
home
repp
energy and environment
discussion groups
calendar
gem
about us
employment
 
REPP-CREST
1612 K Street, NW
Suite 202
Washington, DC 20006
contact us
discussion groups
efficiencyefficiency hydrogenhydrogen solarsolar windwind geothermalgeothermal bioenergybioenergy hydrohydro policypolicy
Gasification Archive for June 2002
87 messages, last added Tue Nov 26 17:18:20 2002

[Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: GAS-L: Small Scale Gasifiers Defined



Patrick and all,

Your explanation is excellent.  Because your message did not make it through to the "Stoves list serve", I am including it below.

However, I must disagree with your conclusion.  You wrote:
Most lay people do not consider this close coupled system a gasifier. Therefore while we could call it "Staged Gasification" or a "Close Coupled Gasifier", we have elected to call it staged combustion.

Except for one year on the Stoves list serve, I am about as much of a "lay person" as can be found.  I definitely want the word "Gasifier" or "Gasification" into the title because the word "Combustion" is where the confusion takes place.  The word "combustion" is a lot like the word "burn".  Neither "combustion" nor "burn" assists the lay person to appreciate what is happening when the process of gasification becomes identifiably distinct from simple "burning." 

Yes, I like your explanation and I like the use of the word "staged" or the words "close-coupled", (or perhaps "closely staged").  But we do need to be sure that anyone reading about these small "combustion chambers" (the name I use to avoid calling them "stoves" that implies cooking) realizes that gasification occurs, and that is "closely coupled" or "staged" with whatever happens next.

And herein lies the problem.  What would you call the "whatever happens next" when the gases are mixed with air and "consumed."???   We cannot use the word "combustion" because it is too vague.  Patrick's full message (below) has a definition for "combustion" that  somehow is not the same as what happens to the gases after they are produced.

I am just the interested lay person, so my next suggestion might be useless:   Could we call that "consuming of the gases" to be considered as "flaring" (or perhaps "flaming")????

If so, does that lead to the name of "combustion chamber for gasification followed by close-coupled flaring"???   Or it could be a "gasifier with close-coupled flaring"    I think that captures what we have been calling "small scale gasifiers".   I suspect that there are some large gasifiers what have close-coupled flaring.  

Whatever happens about the final terminology, this discussion has been helpful to me.  It has also helped clarify the fairly wide gap between those who do "big gasifiers" and those who do "small gasifiers" (meaning the REALLY small ones.) 

I look forward to future sharing of gasifier knowledge with you all.

Paul

At 10:24 AM 6/26/02 -0700, Pat Travis wrote:
Dear Tom and GAS-L subscribers,
 
When defining or putting a "label" onto a process such as gasification there are two distinct audiences that must be considered from a commercial standpoint. The first is the regulatory and technical community and the second is the general public.
 
EPI uses 3 terms for our energy systems. The first, "Combustion", is very straight forward and covers projects utilizing standard fluidized bed combustors which generate heat for process or power applications.
 
The second, "Gasification",  is used when we produce a low Btu gas (LBG) in an oxygen deficient atmosphere and burn the LBG in a second piece of equipment utilizing a specially designed LBG burner, such as a gas boiler, or by injecting it directly into an existing coal fired boiler as a reburn gas. In either case, the LBG is transferred to a separate piece of equipment for combustion. This is done without cooling the LBG, therefore radiant losses from transporting the LBG between the gasifier and the end use device is the only energy loss. This type of two part process is easy for the public to understand and the one I typically find associated with gasification. The same definition applies to processes where the LBG or MBG is cooled prior to use, such as in an engine or turbine.
 
The third, "Staged Combustion", is used to describe what some people may consider a close coupled gasifier. In this process we combine a fluidized bed gasifier bottom with the upper section from a combustor. We generate LBG in the lower portion of the vessel and when it reaches a specific elevation above the gasifier section, combustion air (including dirty process exhaust gases with a high VOC content) is injected and the LBG is ignited. This provides energy for process applications and/or for power production. Most lay people do not consider this close coupled system a gasifier. Therefore while we could call it "Staged Gasification" or a "Close Coupled Gasifier", we have elected to call it staged combustion.
 
I leave it to those better qualified than myself to set the legal definitions.
 
Patrick Travis     Energy Products of Idaho (EPI)

Paul S. Anderson, Ph.D.,  Fulbright Prof. to Mozambique 8/99 - 7/00
Rotary University Teacher Grantee to Mozambique >10 mo of 2001-2003
Dept of Geography - Geology (Box 4400), Illinois State University
Normal, IL  61790-4400   Voice:  309-438-7360;  FAX:  309-438-5310
E-mail: psanders@ilstu.edu - Internet items: www.ilstu.edu/~psanders