 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| |
REPP-CREST
1612 K Street, NW
Suite 202
Washington, DC 20006
contact us
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
| Gasification Archive for August 2002 |
 |
| 71 messages, last added Tue Nov 26 17:18:24 2002 |
[Date Index][Thread Index]
GAS-L: Biomass Gasification and Feeding
Subject: Biomass Gasification and Feeding
>
>
>
>
> I've been following with interest the recent exchanges between Tom Reed,
> Tom Miles, Thomas Koch and others over biomass feeding, in particular the
> feeding of bagasse. This topic has also surfaced several times in the
> past. SRI's James Joyce has recently posted a brief commentary on our
> development work. My purpose with this brief commentary is to bring the
> gasification community up to speed with where the QBIG gasification
> development and SRI's feeder development is at right now.
>
> I'm encouraged by Tom Reed's comment on 4 August ".... the world's most
> difficult feeding fuel - raw bagasse from sugar cane". Chopped straw is
> not too far behind !!! Our considerable experience with the handling of
> raw bagasse at high rates in Australian sugar mills has told us that over
> many years. But to the point. Put simply, SRI and University of
> Queensland, Chemical Engineering (as part of the QBIG gasification
> syndicate) embarked on the development of bagasse gasification technology
> integrated with a sugar mill (that combination provides unique hot fuel gas
> process advantages not found anywhere else) because of a host of technical
> and economic reasons. Whether those reasons remain strong into the future
> remains to be seen !!!! But for now these still exist.
>
> But in setting out on this journey, based on our own extensive experience
> and judgement and with the benefit of the work done elsewhere around the
> world on biomass gasification, we settled on two basic principles to
> underpin our gasifier development (1) the process has to be pressurised
> (although this has yet to be confirmed with detailed engineering, process
> design and costing for Australian circumstances) and (2) we needed a whole
> new feeder for bagasse and cane trash. Based on the Maui experiences
> directly, on our own long experiences with the screwing of bagasse and the
> commercial operating experiences of a sugar mill feeding bagasse using lock
> hoppers for furfural production, any screw device was not acceptable, and
> other devices including lock hoppers did not fit the goals. But as Tom has
> said, bagasse being bagasse, you need a damned good feeder to feed bagasse
> whether the pressure is 25 bar or 2 bar (so called atmospheric - although
> rotary valves would be okay here). Remember that our primary goal in all
> of our development work has been to focus on technology that would deliver
> commercially sustainable plant. The feeder that we have now developed,
> even though it is quite small, has all of the engineering and process
> features that can be readily scaled-up to the rates that we need for our
> proposed BIG/CC projects in our large Australian sugar mills. Raw bagasse
> feeding rates of between 20 and 70 t/h per feeder will be required.
> Notwithstanding Thomas Koch's admirable developments with his piston
> feeder, the intermittent piston approach was judged not to be acceptable
> for our goals - we needed continuous feeding at high very rates.
>
> We have now successfully developed a continuous bagasse feeder that has
> been tested at rates up to about 5 t/h (not sure of the exact figure) for
> test periods of up to two minutes. That is as long a test time as out
> developmental rig will allow us. Our experimental data tells us that this
> has been more than sufficient time to establish stable and consistent
> operating conditions in the feeder. The feeder operations over that time
> also tell us that the real world engineering issues that have to be
> addressed are being addressed, and the feeder can be scaled-up to much
> larger sizes. The current feeder size was selected to be a direct
> application for our proposed 15 MWt (~ 5 MWe) demonstration gasifier, now
> in the planning stages. The particular technology for our feeder comes out
> of our extensive experience with the milling of bagasse to extract sugar
> juice.
>
> I would be happy to provide more information and comment on bagasse feeding
> and gasification in general to those interested as you make contact with me
> directly or through the gasification network.
>
> Dr Terry Dixon
> Manager Engineering Group
> Sugar Research Institute
> Box 5611
> Mackay MC 4741
> AUSTRALIA
> Ph: +61 7 49527600
> Fx: +61 7 49527699
> Mb: 0418 185 309
> email: t.dixon@sri.org.au
>
>
> -------------------------------
>
> This email message (including any file attachments transmitted with it) is
> for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential
> and privileged information. Any unauthorised alteration, disclosure or
> distribution is prohibited. If you received this email in error, please
> notify the sender by return email and destroy all copies of the original
> message.
>
> Any confidentiality or legal professional privilege is not waived or lost
> by any mistaken delivery of the email.
>
> -------------------------------
-
Gasification List Archives:
http://www.crest.org/discussion/gasification/200202/
Gasification List Moderator:
Tom Reed, Biomass Energy Foundation, Reedtb2@cs.com
www.webpan.com/BEF
List-Post: <mailto:gasification@crest.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gasification-help@crest.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gasification-unsubscribe@crest.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gasification-subscribe@crest.org>
Sponsor the Gasification List: http://www.crest.org/discuss3.html
-
Other Gasification Events and Information:
http://www.bioenergy2002.org
http://www.crest.org/articles/static/1/1010424940_7.html Bioenergy
http://www.crest.org/articles/static/1/1011975339_7.html Gasification
http://www.crest.org/articles/static/1/1011975672_7.html Carbon
 |
 |
|