"andrew.heggie@dtn.ntl.com" wrote:
> David, I would describe the device as a turbulent burner and your modification as a pyroliser using the turbulent burner to heat a retort and as a flare for the offgas. You have chosen a different route to the one I preferred in recycling the enthalpy of the offgas to provide heat for pyrolysis as well as heat for other purposes.
>
> I cannot post to stoves at present so feel free to forward it to the list.
>
Andrew,
I was referring to my retort itself as being the "quasi gassifier" rather than the whole device.
Since we last corresponded I have scrapped the idea of the internal retort, following my actual observations and further analysis of the data. I have now realised that the email I sent to Ken Boak setting out my reasons and proposals was not forwarded to you. However I will shortly post to this List to briefly explains, this will, I
hope, throw the subject open for discussion and solicit some worthwhile opinions.
I have un-subscribed from the Stoves list because of the virus problem so I cannot post their either.
David.
-
Gasification List Archives:
http://www.crest.org/discussion/gasification/200202/
Gasification List Moderator:
Tom Reed, Biomass Energy Foundation, Reedtb2@cs.com
www.webpan.com/BEF
List-Post: <mailto:gasification@crest.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gasification-help@crest.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gasification-unsubscribe@crest.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gasification-subscribe@crest.org>
Sponsor the Gasification List: http://www.crest.org/discuss3.html
-
Other Gasification Events and Information:
http://www.bioenergy2002.orghttp://www.crest.org/articles/static/1/1010424940_7.html Bioenergy
http://www.crest.org/articles/static/1/1011975339_7.html Gasification
http://www.crest.org/articles/static/1/1011975672_7.html Carbon
