 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| |
REPP-CREST
1612 K Street, NW
Suite 202
Washington, DC 20006
contact us
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
| Gasification Archive for October 2002 |
 |
| 28 messages, last added Tue Nov 26 17:18:30 2002 |
[Date Index][Thread Index]
GAS-L: Re: Gasifier terminology clarification
Stovers and Gasifiers
Tom's recent message did not go to the Stovers, so I have left it in the
message below.
I have no problem understanding the term pyrolysis or pyrolyser or
pyrolytic. The problem come with the term "gasify" because it is so vague
in general usage and (see below) used so specifically by
professionals. (see below)
At 01:17 AM 10/29/02 -0700, Tom Reed wrote:
>Dear Paul and aul:
>
>Concerning the choice of "pyrolyser" of "gasifier" or "pyrolytic gasifier":
>
>There are many kinds of gasifiers (>20,000 by my recent note). ALL
>gasifiers (and combustors) by necessity include a pyrolytic stage as they go
>through the heating from 20-500C which releases volatiles and sometimes
>partially oxidized (to CH4, CO and H2) pyrolytic gases (in flaming
>pyrolysis). Other gasifiers then (at higher temperatures) gasify the
>charcoal for a higher production of gas, less charcoal.
SOMEHOW, substitute a different word for "gasify" in the previous
sentence. OR give us a modifier (adjective) to refer to "XYZ gasify". A
generic word that means "to make into a gas" cannot also mean a SPECIFIC
type of making into a gas. Even "high temperature gasification" is inadequate.
It is better that the experts give us the defining terms (complete with
adjectives or distinctive names for each "specific act of gasification")
than to let the laypersons give those labels.
>So if we stop at the end of the flaming pyrolysis, Wendelbroe chooses to
>call it a pyrolyser. We are talking about the same reality. These fine
>points are more than the average user can absorb, so I choose to call it a
>gasifier.
I can accept it either way, with the understanding that if asked what kind
of gasifier it is, we would need to say that it is a
pyrolysis-gasifier or a pyrolysis-based gasifier or some other equally
specific term.
Likewise, the big systems are also gasifiers, but if asked what kind of
gasifier they are, then they are "full-system biomass-to-ash
pyrolsysis-plus-XYZ reductive blah-blah-blah CO-generator
gasifiers" (shortened to be a "FSBTAPPXYZRBBBCG gasifier") NOTE the
humor intended, because this name is not user-friendly.
In other words, what do you call the type of gasification that occurs in
the big gasifiers AFTER the pyrolysis process takes place?
Paul
>Only heavy duty steam reforming or oxidation can get rid of all tars, so all
>gasifiers produce some char, some tar and some gas. Just a difference of
>proportions. I suspect that the tars in our "inverted downdraft gasifiers"
>might be as high as 1% and I hope to measure them soon.
>
>~~~~~
>Sounds like Wendelbroe and company have lost interest, since I haven't heard
>since. Please see if you can find Per S. Nielson at Danish Technical
>University and send him an Email. I'm curious too.
>
>Onward, TOM REED
Paul S. Anderson, Ph.D., Fulbright Prof. to Mozambique 8/99 - 7/00
Rotary University Teacher Grantee to Mozambique >10 mo of 2001-2003
Dept of Geography - Geology (Box 4400), Illinois State University
Normal, IL 61790-4400 Voice: 309-438-7360; FAX: 309-438-5310
E-mail: psanders@ilstu.edu - Internet items: www.ilstu.edu/~psanders
Gasification List Moderator:
Tom Reed, Biomass Energy Foundation, tombreed@attbi.com Biomass =
Energy Foundation, www.woodgas.com
List-Post: <mailto:gasification@crest.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gasification-help@crest.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gasification-unsubscribe@crest.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gasification-subscribe@crest.org>
-
Gasification List Archives http://www.crest.org/discussion/gasification/200202/
Bioenergy 2002 http://www.bioenergy2002.org/
200 kWe CHP Discussion
http://crest.org/discussiongroups/resources/gasification/200kWCHP.html
Gasification Reference http://www.crest.org/articles/static/1/1011975339_7.html
>
 |
 |
|