Adam Trombly is a leading multi-disciplinary climatologist and
physicist with Project Earth which he founded with Buckminster Fuller http://www.projectearth.com
Videotape of this conference with this speech as well as
those of Paramahamsa Tewari and Bruce DePalma are available. Email gear2000@lightspeed.net for
info
1988 Adam Trombly, Colorado
Springs
As this is the last speech of the conference here, I’m going
to give an overview of the development of zero point theory and I’m going to try
and take into account all of you have been very patient...
The basic
principle which we are obviously here to address, was originally elaborated by
Nikola Tesla. The sense that Nikola Tesla conveyed of existence was, if not
unique, then certainly it was profoundly inspired, not so much by initial
analysis but by initial vision.
We have become a rather left brain biased
society, an analytically biased society and as a result of this analytical
bias we tend to refute or deny the validity of intuitive jumps or intuitive
leaps and insight.
Tesla was an extraordinarily prolific inventor
obviously, but in addition to being a prolific inventor, he explored very
thoroughly, for his time, the dimension of the psyche. And I think that perhaps
too often we tend to forget that he himself claimed that the source of his
inspiration was not conventional.
He saw what he built, and then he
described it to a draftsman, and built it. The draftsman was his interface with
substance. To consider that when he was riding in his carriage or his Pierce
Arrow here in Colorado Springs, not to far from where we are right now, he would
often see devices in their totality, spontaneously.... is quite remarkable.
When you see something in its totality, it tends to have a different
meaning than if you tried to put the pieces of the universe back together to
arrive at a conclusion. Tesla insisted that he rested in the conclusion in his
own psyche. I think this is very important. Tesla was not an analytical
apologist, he was not somebody who made gestures to the scientific community to
make himself necessarily acceptable in his time. What was acceptable was that he
produced. The means by which he produced were often unacceptable, especially in
the last couple of decades.
Therefore, we heard a lot about Thomas
Edison, and we heard a lot in our education about just about everybody else
except Nikola Tesla. The reason I’m sure this Society exists is this left a
vacuum, a huge vacuum that is not merely filled by the acknowledgment of
Nikola Tesla, but by the
acknowledgment of the function of a human being, the
function of a being not being polarized to the left hemisphere, but
balanced to the two hemispheres of the brain, in other words vision coupled with
analysis.
In the development of our generator, which we
originally called the “Acyclic Closed Magnetic Generator,” vision was implicitly
necessary to arrive at our conclusions. Basically we had to work from very
little information. There were very few explorers in the field and we had to
begin to consider that perhaps the way we considered reality actually
fundamentally incorrect, that fundamental cornerstones such as the law of
induction, for example, that particular cornerstone was not necessarily as we
believed it to be.
What stimulated me, and I’ve said this before,
since 1980, was the recognition that certain astrophysical phenomena express
energies in excess of what the apparent input is. This is a very common thing in
astrophysics, whether you’re talking about quasi-stellar objects, or whether
you’re talking about the planet Jupiter.
When we first found out
that the planet Jupiter was developing a looped current between itself and the
moon Io, Jupiter was called, in a paper published by a Goddard scientist at
NASA, a “Homopolar generator.”
They tried to rationalize that the relative
motion between the moon Io and Jupiter was actually responsible for the current
that we could measure by virtue of its magnetic flux tube as tested by satellite
probe. But when you went through some very simple calculations, you found that
was not true.
So we decided that we would look into the matter of
“Homopolar” generation itself- the history, who came up with it, as Bruce
DePalma and others have pointed out. Even though Michael Faraday did an
experiment on December 26th,
1831, in which he co-rotated a magnet with a cooper disk and measured a current
output. Even though he had done that experiment, his own law of induction tended
to ignore that fact.
A professor with the Royal Society in London, a
professor of science history, told me that the original Faraday cage was
designed to keep electromagnetic noise out, but to keep Michael in. You see he
played with a substance we call mercury, and in those days there was very little
appreciation for the toxicity of mercury. And so Faraday apparently suffered
from a form of dementia, which we’ve heard very little about because it’s one of
the cornerstones of the building we have been living in, in science.
We found
out after we found Faraday’s diary, after we found the citations of the
experiments that he had done, that there was a gentleman by the name of Bruce
DePalma in Santa Barbara, California, who had suggested that on the basis of the
co-rotation of a magnet and a conductor, which we were at that time
contemplating ourselves, it might be possible to generate more energy out from
the generator than input in.
I must say that my initial response to that
was probably not as skeptical as some people might be when they heard such a
thing, because in the field of astronomy an astrophysics it is not uncommon, not
uncommon at all to find an object that is obviously exceeding what we “know” to
be its thermonuclear, or any other form, it’s exceeding the output that it could
possibly have by thermonuclear means, by fusion, by fission, by anything we
normally consider.
And so, because we had seen that already in space
there was this planet Jupiter clearly being a demonstration of what we initially
considered to be an anomaly. Clearly putting out three times as much energy as
it could be possibly be receiving from the Sun. We decided to reduce to practice
a form of generator with the intention of practical commercial use, and through
various good fortunes we arrived at funding.
We actually, for this field
in those days, got substantial funding. And as a result of that work, we applied
for a patent in 1980 which was, as many of you know, denied by the U.S. Patent
Office as being implausible to the extreme. The statement was to the effect
that, “This device could not even generate electricity.” It wasn’t that it
couldn’t generate electricity in excess of input, it was that the machine
couldn’t generate electricity at all. The patent officer himself was, as many of
us, as all of us basically were unfamiliar, he being totally unfamiliar, with
the fact that you could co-rotate a magnet with a copper disc, even though we
had provided him with a copy of a page from Faraday’s diary. He actually
suggested that the diary notes might have been something created expo
factos.
My initial naiveté in entering this field was rapidly
destroyed.
We felt that if we could produce a practical, commercial,
viable unit, then the world would be very excited indeed. And what we discovered
instead was we were dealing with a profound level of inertia; inertia in a frame
of reference we didn’t normally consider.
Economic inertia, intellectual stasis and
dogma. Certainly the explorers in this field, over time, whether it’s myself, or
Bruce DePalma, or Tewari or going back to Moray, Tesla, Hubble. These people all
discovered this inertia. It is an astonishing thing when you first encounter it.
It is irrational. It says that no, indeed the Earth is the center and everything
revolves around it. And the moons around Jupiter couldn’t possibly be doing that
what you say.
Galileo wasn’t vindicated by the Catholic Church until
1984. If we took that many centuries to acknowledge zero point vacuum
fluctuation-based technologies, we will all be dead. And that’s the sobering
realization that I have come to over the last five years.
Buckminster
Fuller was a huge influence in my life. I met him when I was sixteen years old
and largely because of his influence I wasn’t permanently lost in space
lost in the theoretical level of things. And therefore, when I began to
encounter this resistance he said something that was very important to me. He
said that every new idea, every new technology, every major breakthrough, has an
inevitable period of gestation. He said you must learn to be patient. He had
experienced profound resistance, as you may know, to various ideas that he had
in the thirties.
I think that what we are really seeing is not the
resistance or inertia imposed upon this technology, but instead a resistance to
a fundamental shift in perception about the Universe itself.
We have
tended to describe ourselves in discrete terms, as encapsulated beings, with
rather defined boundary layers, both temporally and spatially.
We’re born and
we die. The boundaries of our body are the boundaries of are being. Inspiration
has a difficult time entering into a closed bottle. Where would it come from?
Where would it appear?
How could Nikola Tesla say he got ideas from
space? He was considered a very eccentric and crazy man as a result of his
statements. People point out that he always had all these napkins piled up next
to his plate. But by the end of his life, people had forgotten that his vision
is what is powering these lights. And if we had continued with his vision, we
wouldn’t have a fossil fuel economy today. And J.P. Morgan and Rockefeller and a
number of other individuals would not have amassed extraordinary fortunes on the
basis of that fossil fuel economy.
I think this is extremely important
for us to understand because when Nikola Tesla’s vision was denied a part of our
own vision was denied. Just as when Galileo’s vision was denied. The fact of the
matter is that as we sit or stand here, a field of energy pervades us. This even
relatively conventional physicists like John Archibald Wheeler stated in a 1962
article in the Review of Modern Physics. “Energy has a mass equivalence of ten
to the ninety-fourth power grams per centimeter.” You just need to look in the
literature. That ninety-fourth power grams per cubic centimeter represents a
rather coherent state. It represents something that we could very easily call a
continuum.
But because of the taboo against the idea that you might
perhaps be able
to get water from the well of space, or what people call
“perpetual motion,” there has not been a sense of any kind of practical
application.
Once in a seminar, well over a decade ago, I asked a
question I found was extraordinarily taboo, and I said, “Why can’t we tap into
this field?”
It had been established in the literature in Europe by Philip
Sipolan (sp?)
since 1951 and 1952, that not only did the fluctuation field
exist, a fluctuation field of extraordinary energy equivalence. And that the
vacuum field was biasable, that it was polarizable.
The polarizablity of
a vacuum, fluctuation background, I believe is the essential issue, and a very
simple issue indeed that we need to really consider.
David Deutch in 1982
explored briefly in a book called “General Relativity,” on Einstein’s centenary,
which was edited by Hawking, considered very briefly the fact that not only is
the vacuum polarizable in terms of density, but that an ideal theoretical
situation density polarization could asymmetrically approach infinite density
and asymmetrically approach negative energy density. That means that within the
vacuum fluctuation itself, stress can be created. That means that the vortical
dynamic that Tewari speaks of is really not that difficult to imagine, because
you have fluctuation density that wishes to remain isotropic, or uniformly
distributed, disrupted, polarized, in a curved manifold, and that vacuum density
once polarized wants to relax from that stress back into a more isotropic state.
Anybody who studies vortical physics, fluid dynamics, plasma dynamics
knows that there is no greater stress than that by which we invoke a vortical
momentum. And therefore it is not hard to imagine, if we simply consider the
fact that we are dealing with a medium of this extraordinary density. It is not
hard to imagine or even begin to feel that just by simply biasing this field in
a rotating cylinder or perhaps in an oscillating circuit, by biasing this field
correctly, we can precipitate vortical momentum.
Now we may only
precipitate a quasi-electron. In the vacuum fluctuation of space, their
production is occurring all the time. In a bias environment however, where an
electrical potential exists, that quasi-electron, instead of annihilating with
its anti-particle, might indeed be distracted along the potential and find its
way into what we refer to very blithely as manifestation.
It doesn’t
necessarily take gig electron volts for this to occur. And that’s why Tewari,
DePalma, myself and others speak of the generation of power from
space.
We need to very simply and seriously consider that it’s already in
the literature. It isn’t just in the literature of the fringe; It’s in the
literature now even of Physical Review since 1975. Review of Modern Physics,
since 1962. And in the European literature since the 1950’s. It’s a remarkable
thing that because of the bias against so-called “perpetual motion,” or
so-called, “Free energy,” that nobody seems to want to extrapolate what is
implicitly obvious.
The atom itself can then be seen as a dynamic
modification of field space. Only a dynamic modification of field space, with no
quality of stasis whatso-ever.
Harold Putoff, in his May 15th, 1987 article in Physical Review,
pointed out that in order for the Hydrogen atom in its ground state not to
collapse, it had to be absorbing energy from the fluctuation background. In this
moment. This is not something that happened at T equals zero - before the Big
Bang.
This is something happening at
this moment, real time present context, now with every atom and molecule that we
see configured before us. It is happening right now.
It is wonderful to
have Dr. Putov describe this energy in terms of the Bohr atom. It is implicit
that the electron orbit dissipates energy. If we consider that to be a resonant
shell with no locatable density bias, then it still pertains because the atom
itself, even in its ground state, resonates in space.
We have a picture,
that we got when we were young, that says a thing is solid, even though particle
physicists are telling us that nothing is solid, and while that’s all very
fascinating on Nova television, we still have a picture that persists. Can an
atom, existing in certain states of polarization and stress, perhaps become a
conduit drawing upon the energy of space? A transducer in a certain
light.
Obviously it must be or else it couldn’t exist. The electron
itself must be spontaneously appearing out of the background field. If it was
not spontaneously persisting then we have to invoke the somewhat Neanderthal
concept that everything had to start at a certain moment. And because we have
embraced this new cosmology of the Big Bang in the last couple of decades, we
have some real problems.
This is not the best forum to go into this in
great detail, but I will say this - the Universe is clumpy. That’s a term that
is used frequently in astrophysics to describe the fact that mass is not
uniformly or isotropically distributed. It is simply not. On a large-scale basis
with models that have assimilated data from observatories from all over the
world, especially over the last few years, we have seen that the Universe we
observe is indeed clumpy. It is in fact concentrated in a way that cannot be the
artifact of a Big Bang.
Now that’s a bold statement. Alfven (Swiss Nobel
Laureate), famous for Alfven waves, has come up with an extraordinarily
beautiful description of the Plasma dynamics of space. And so far, interesting
to note, although he was considered to be a complete heretic when he came out
with his theory, every single observation we have made from space with satellite
probes, has confirmed his predictions. I think it very important that everybody
here who is interested in the reality in which we adhere, become familiar with
either the esoteric or the exoteric level of Alfven’s work. It’s just beginning
to appear in the literature. I think Discover magazine had a rather prosaic
presentation of it but it was also quite good. (June ‘88; the “Big Bang Never
Happened.”)
If there was not a Big Bang, where things conveniently began
with a single event, then we need to begin to consider the fact that something
that has a gram equivalence of about a gram per cubic centimeter, which is our
body, must be a rather insignificant modification of a field that has a
potential of ten to the ninety-fourth power/grams per cubic
centimeter.
This impacts the way in which we live together; it impacts
the way in which we live with the Earth itself.
I had not initially
planned today to show some slides from the NASA program, but because this is a
cap speech at the end of the day, I feel that it might be very useful to digress
for a moment and observe the rather catastrophic impact that the very concept of
discrete encapsulation has had upon human existence and the Earth itself.
And I would suggest to you, after considerable study of the subject,
which is now becoming accepted in the Literature worldwide, that we cannot
sustain the dynamic of human existence any longer unless we begin to transcend
the arbitrary, subjective boundaries that we presume to be true. Whether these
boundaries are about ourselves, or all phenomena of manifest existence, until we
begin to move beyond this anal-retentive state, in which everything must be
particularized. Everything being particularized, leaves Humpty
Dumpty.
We will never be able to re-assemble
existence.
As Fuller pointed out to me at an early age, “existence is
already implicitly whole, we break it into parts only in our minds
only.”
It is already unified whether or not we have a unified field
theory or not. And as Einstein suggested at his last series of lectures at the
Advanced Institute at Princeton, “perhaps we can only appreciate the unified
field by entering a conscious relationship with it.”
Again, this is
something that would not have been at all contrary to what Nikola Tesla
proposed, and yet some people would be embarrassed to say it.
I think we
need to very succinctly consider that we cannot continue to burn fossil fuels on
this planet, and that we really haven’t found anything to do with our nuclear
waste.
And that the appearance of bona-fide third party confirmation of
the generation of energy from space is a significant event in history. It’s not
significant because it will make a few men popular, or unpopular. It’s not
significant because it will somehow create a minor change in our concept of
being. It’s significant because it represents a dramatic shift that we
desperately need to embrace.
Right now we are sitting at the edge of an
unprecedented human catastrophe on this planet. A friend of mine, Sayed Sayed
(sp?), at Texas A&M who has for twenty years been a climatologist, in an
elegant experiment recently carried out in Antarctica, has shown clearly that if
we lose between 6% and 7% more of the remaining stratospheric ozone the
phytoplankton in the oceans will die.
The phytoplankton in our oceans
contribute 50% of the oxygen that we enjoy on this planet. It is extremely
important to point out that prior to the appearance of photosynthesizing
biomass; oxygen was a trace gas which basically appeared through the natural
transitions of H/2O.
We simply cannot afford to lose any more oxygen
than we already have. At this moment, literally hundreds of millions of internal
combustion engines are running. A six cylinder engine, of normal displacement,
consumes eight hundred thousand (800,000) cubic centimeters of oxygen per hour.
This transforms the breathable O/2 into combustion by-products, an entire
spectrum of combustion products.
In the last twenty years, in Africa
alone, we have destroyed 64% of the biomass ground cover. In the last twenty
years! This is a United Nations Environmental Program figure, confirmed by
satellite and manned space flight telemetry.
Also, in the last twenty
years we have consumed 29% of the photosynthesizing ground cover in Central and
South America. In the last twenty years! You cannot consume oxygen at the same
time you consume the factories that metabolize CO/2 and return O/2 to us, and
expect to have a sustainable environment. Because as oxygen tensions decrease
even a few percent in the troposphere, ozone tensions decrease
disproportionately. This is because there is a column of oxygen and other gases
that rises from the biosphere to the troposphere and then to the stratosphere.
It is on the basis of the mixture of these gases, that we have ozone in the
atmosphere.
I would suggest that we can not afford to wait to demand that
serious money is applied to this research, Federal money. We need this to happen
desperately and we need this to happen immediately. And for those of us who feel
that we can be blasé, and wait and wait and wait until somehow this becomes
acceptable, (the implementation of this new kind of technology) let me just say
that if we think we can wait; we’re sorely deluded.
You wonder why there is a drought in
Ethiopia. You hear in Time magazine that the so-called scientists can’t figure
out why there is a drought. Well,
Ethiopia at the beginning of the century
was covered by 43% forest. Ethiopia today is covered by less than 4% forest. How
is the hydraulic cycle supposed to maintain itself?
This at first, this
entire consideration at first, seemed to be in rather left field of the
consideration of energy generation. But, as I began to explore it further and
further and lectured around the world, I began to discover that most of the
human race has been entirely uninformed. Some people have suggested this is
rather conspiratorial. The slides you are going to see in just a minute have
been available, some of them, for several years. We finally got a few of them on
CNN December 25th (1987?)
I think when you see them you’re going to realize why they are so
significant. And as always I would like to thank Richard Underwood of NASA, now
retired, for providing these images. They are in the public domain, but anyone
who has tried to get photographic data from the NASA space flight program,
especially during the Reagan Administration, will find that it is a very
difficult thing to do. As a matter of fact, most of the infrared photography is
now stored at AMES, and you can’t get into the building. Even though this
material is not classified, the building itself is off limits.
I would
like to have the lights dimmed, and I would like to show these slides and then
we can go on from there. We can discuss in more detail about this and other
things.
This is the way clouds are supposed to look over the rain
forest. These are health clouds. These clouds are appearing over the Northern
Congo area and this photograph was taken in the mid-seventies from Skylab.
Cumulonimbus, Stratocumulus, very beautiful cloud formations and an
extraordinary density of water vapor as you can see.
Next slide. This is
what the ground looks like after you get rid of the forest. This picture isn’t
from Africa, it’s from Brazil, but literally millions of hectares worldwide look
like this today. You can see that the watershed to this river, which is the Sao
Paulo River, has been almost totally devastated.
You can see that
evaporation would occur rather rapidly instead of in a moderated sense through
the membrane canopy of the forest.
The next slide shows the way clouds
look after you do this. By the way, this is the same coordinate almost exactly,
taken from the Space Shuttle in 1984, as the slides big billowy beautiful clouds
from Skylab ten years earlier. What you see beneath this cloudbank is now
desert. So the cloud building is no longer healthy. Instead of that nice kind of
veil of water vapor, you see an extraordinary, Los Angeles scale, optical
density. That’s dust.
Dust that has been lifted and aerosolized and now
remains in chronic suspension over much of the African continent. The clouds are
flat. The convective, humid currents that rose from the rain forest no longer
carry water vapor in significant quantities.
There was a great effort, a
joint effort of the United Nations and several other countries to seed what
clouds remain to see if the hydraulic cycle could be restored. Unfortunately
somebody forgot to plant anything under the seeded clouds, so the desert is now
growing. The Sahara desert is now growing six miles per year and is three
thousand mile across. This is significant.
Next slide please. This is to
give you an idea of the scale. We are not looking at the desert floor here. We
are looking at a pall of dust that stretches as far as the eye can see, to the
curvature of the Earth. Twenty-five maybe twenty-eight thousand square miles
here. This area all used to be called the sub-Sahara and now is moving into the
Sahara. Flat clouds, no rain.
The next slide will show you conclusively
that when you see breaks in the pattern, you have a deeper understanding of the
optical density. This density is equivalent to a critical day in Los Angeles.
This again is chronic and has serious ramifications for us on this continent.
Serious ramifications.
This has happened because somebody denied vision.
This has happened because when in 1906 Nikola Tesla said that fossil fuels would
one day create a corruption in the entire atmosphere of the Earth, he was called
eccentric. Next slide please.
South of the aridification process, in
Zaire we have fires. These fires are burning out of control. They have no planes
to drop chemicals on the fires. They have no fire departments. They have no
money. This is a small area, only a hundred by a hundred miles. You can see
where the forest that was once there has already been striped away, and the
hydraulic cycle therefore undermined.
The next picture is Angola burning. The CIA
did not win the war in Angola, fire did. 13,000,000 acres burned in 1985. When
NASA scientists examined this photograph, they thought that this was some sort
of strange cloud until they realized it was the combination of the plumes of
smoke from the fires. Just consider the area involved, and consider the fact
that this is now being visited on our Country.
Alaska, in the last three
weeks has lost 750,000 acres to fire. The Secretary of the Interior, Hodel said,
“Let Nature take its course.” They saved part of Yellowstone that was close to
Old Faithful, but decided that the rest of the wildlife habitat was expendable.
And this while we are spending hundreds of millions of dollars producing
neutron bombs and other clean kill weapons, which can never be used and God
forbid that they ever should be.
The next slide please. This is Junguoy
(sp?) Bay on the coast of Madagascar, and it is not uncharacteristic of bays all
over the world now. This is what happens after the deforestation and after the
fires. This bay was over six hundred feet deep twenty years ago. Now you can
walk across it during the dry season it is so filled with silt. This is
happening now, today. It is not theoretical. We have to move now.
Next
slide please. This beautiful lake was called Chad. Lake Chad was the size of
Lake Erie. Lake Chad supported 1.8 million human beings in peripheral
agriculture and fisheries. The next slide is Lake Chad in 1982.
It’s the
hole that was left when the hydrological cycle was destroyed in Africa. This is
not a cyclical drought and it is not a drought that will be only visited on
Africa. The water vapor distribution on this planet is being changed
dramatically by the destruction of biomass.
The water vapor budget on
this planet is being changed dramatically because we have failed to feel beyond
our own little subjective event horizons. We tend to exist like psychic black
holes. We take a lot and give too little.
A few years ago I pointed out
at the fourth International conference on Atmospheric, that the drought of 1986
and 1988 would occur. Now they have occurred. They are not going to cease
because we don’t want them to occur. They are not going to cease until we
realize that we need to mobilize every democracy on this planet, and hopefully
this will someday soon include the Soviet Union, to implement this new class of
technologies. We can address these issues by planting forests and by using
energy generated by these new Technologies. Whether you call it an “N” machine
or something else, I’m sure these technologies will continue to evolve.
By utilizing this energy which we can get directly from the “vacuum” of
Space, we can desalinate re-irrigate. The Israelis if nothing else
have shown us that you can resurrect a desert. We are going to need to resurrect
a planet. We cannot posture ourselves and say that National Security comes
before the security of the Human race. It is the security of the human race in
total that is now threatened.
This is the last slide. I’m only
going to show eleven slides today. I think they speak for themselves. This veil
of dust that stretches out towards the horizon across the Atlantic Ocean,
reaching from the Caribbean Sea, in the lower portion, all the way to the
African coast. This is not a phenomenon that occurred in one year. This is a
phenomenon that occurs every year. Between eight and nine million square
kilometers this year. (8-9,000,000 sq. miles)
This dust acts as condensation nuclei for
water vapor causing precipitation in the south, over water, in Honduras, in
Nicaragua, while the Midwest and Southeast are parched.
We are changing
the way things work and we haven’t even begun to inspect the ramifications. It
isn’t just the “Greenhouse Effect,” it’s a much more complex issue.
Only
by stepping over the threshold into a more synergistic view, which is not just a
kind of convenient term bandied about for the sake of the “New Age,” but only by
entering into a more synergistic view which acknowledges the inherent coherence
of phenomena, can we begin to comprehend the fact that when you do something
here it affects something over there. In quantum geometrodynamics, actually in a
number of other studies, what we call action at a distance, in a coherent field,
distance is no presumed.
I hope that this all has said something.
Fuller’s suggestion was that Project Earth should either determine whether there
was a reason why we had to implement these technologies, or whether it was no
big deal.
“Can we last longer? - I need to get my next grant from
DuPont.” To produce more chlorofluorocarbons? “Yes, it does seem that it might
have that effect, but if I say that in the literature than I am defying my
contract.”
Scientific integrity, which used to be something that
characterized science, is something that is sadly lacking in too much of the
scientific community. Too many have become grant whores and parasitic on
society, posturing themselves as authorities, condemned to the inertia of the
past and past conceptualizations of reality.
Recently I was lecturing at
John Hopkins, which is in itself sort of a miracle, about zero point physics and
while we were considering zero point physics somebody said, “Well this is all
well and good that mister Tewari did this over in India, and that it’s all well
and good that you’ve done this in the United States DePalma, it’s all well
and good to demonstrate it, but what about the United States government?”
“I mean wouldn’t the United States government be doing something?” the
child asked. A sixty-two year old child, a very nice man actually. And I said
all you need to do is get a hold of the 1986 fiscal year “Request for Proposals”
published by the Department of Defense.
Look on page 193 of that
document and you will see something very interesting. In AF section, which is
Air Force section 86-77 subsection 6, you will see that a government which
denies the reality of zero point technologies is requesting .... “further
research into esoteric energies heretofore unknown including the zero point
dynamic fluctuations of Space.” ... for propulsion. But it doesn’t exist you
see...
But we want you to research it if you have a bona fide
organization that happens to be a prime contractor with triple security
clearance. This for propulsion for the Air Force when the entire human race is
threatened. Now there is a certain kind of insanity somewhere implicit in that.
It’s in the literature, you can order a copy from Project Earth, or call the
Pentagon. This is not a classified document. I won’t get in trouble for saying
anything. This is actually a program that is ongoing, right now, today, within
the government enclave. Call Los Alamos and ask a question about it and you
might get a very long silence on the other end. Call Lawrence Livermore
Laboratories, their Aberdeen Testing grounds. The same phenomenon will probably
occur.
A significant amount of funding is going to
make sure that this irrelevant, mythical phenomena is applied to weapons systems
and weapons carrying systems. Something is very wrong about that. I don’t
believe that anybody sitting in this room would say that it’s in the best
interest of our people, or any people of the world, for this kind of technology
to be applied outside the realm of civilian application at such a time.
Six to seven percent further depletion in stratospheric ozone and we are
seeing depletion rate trends that indicate that this level of loss will occur
very easily within the next two decades. Those of us who have really considered
this, and as you consider it more and more I’m sure you’ll realize that two
decades pass very quickly, for all of us. It doesn’t give us time, as I said
before for subjectivity.
This field has survived, but not on the basis
of being acceptable in the literature. Tewari has tried to publish. I know the
IEEE (International Electrical and Electronic Engineers) is in involved in this
conference, but Tewari tried to publish in IEEE and was summarily rejected. Many
of us have tried to publish and have been rejected. The reason Tewari even
bothered to try to duplicate this “Acyclic Closed Magnetic Generator,” after
years of correspondence with DePalma, was because he was able to convince some
mechanical engineers that it had some engineering method. You see they actually
did material stress analysis.
We also analyzed. We used Beryllium copper
for a reason. It’s just engineering. There are a lot of you in this room who are
perfectly capable of doing it. There was nothing magical. We just operated on a
different presumption. We said, “Maybe this experiment will work.” And if it
doesn’t work, well then it’s like 88% of the rest of them. If it does work, heh,
then there is another level of confirmation.
Robert Kinchloe, Professor
Emeritus of Stanford University, went to visit the, how can we call it, the
encumbered “Sunburst Machine.” This machine was originally developed by DePalma,
Richardson and Bernard at Sunburst Farms, Santa Barbara, California. Dr.
Kinchloe just out of curiosity of his own mind, decided that he would just see
if there was something about it that was unusual. He presented a paper on it and
I understand that it only got to Bruce through somebody else. But that’s not
unusual, my own attorney directed my attention to an article I never knew
existed. It’s funny about that.
It’s funny when representatives from our own
Government look me straight in the eye and say, “Yes we know this is real, but
we wonder why you would disclose it to foreign nations?”
I said, “I
didn’t disclose it to foreign nations. It was in an international publication in
1982 and I didn’t even know it.”
I would suggest to you that it’s time
for us to not simply entertain a curiosity. I would suggest to you that it’s
time for us to enter a human process of inter-relationship, to try to attempt to
reintegrate ourselves with one another and not in a floaty kind of “new age”
sense necessarily at all. Just call ten people and ask them to each call ten
people and tell them that we have an emergency on our hands. Demand that the
people we are hiring represent us, supposedly, not the major
corporations. We are hiring these people to represent US! Which one of
you has the power to lobby in Washington?
We need to send a very clear
message to Washington that states, “Gee, don’t you think its silly to be talking
about Star Wars? We’re only talking about Global Genocide.” This without doing
anything except for what we are doing right now. We don’t have to drop a bomb or
fight a war. Just continue exactly as we are now. All we have to do is remain in
this collective state of inertia. And I don’t personally believe we are going to
do that. I don’t believe that human beings are not going to rise to this
occasion. I don’t believe it for a second.
But, I do believe we need
first to understand what we are confronted with. And then we need to understand
that we can do something about it. We need to act, and we need to act like
somebody who is being chased by a hot poker, or someone who
cares.
Whichever your response is, Act!
Ten people calling ten
people calling ten people, covers the country in a week. It’s called
“Exponential Networking.” I didn’t come up with the idea, Fuller did. Call ten
people. Ask them to call ten people and find out what happens. It’s the
equivalence of an electron avalanche in human society. It works.
So, I
wanted to try to give a wrap-up and I wanted to cite the fact that we wouldn’t
be here if it weren’t for somebody’s vision. Yes, their vision was applied. Yes,
their vision, his vision, Nikola Tesla’s vision was brought into life. Otherwise
he would have been a mere mystic, wouldn’t he?
Yes, we do have to sit
down with our Macintoshes, or sit with our Hewlet Packard 41C calculators. We
had a lot of money (for this field). A total between the two phases of the
experiment of about $200,000. And now I’m finally happy to say it looks
like it’s going to be produced, or at least this one is going to be produced. It
looks like DePalma is also moving into that modality.
We are certainly
hoping that more people will come out of the woodworks and say, “Hey, well I’ve
had this thing for the last thirty years but I was told that if I brought it out
into the Public when I was working at Los Alamos twenty years ago, they would
basically permit character assassination to ensue.”
It’s hard to believe
in some ways, and I don’t want to paint a black picture, but I think we have to
see the end of times when the New York Times calls a National Center of
Atmospheric Research scientist to ask, “How come everyone in the world says that
the Reagen report on Acid Rain is a lie?” And the man answers, “You don’t
understand the kind of pressure we’re under here. People’s careers are in
jeopardy.” This when all our lives are at stake.
So I would like to open
the floor to questions....
“.....I raised a question in another
seminar about the oxygen depletion, and the speaker told me that even if we were
to kill all the forests at once it would take a very long time for the oxygen to
dissipate out of the atmosphere....
We are talking about a change in
the mixture of gases, okay? There are people who say that even if you combusted
all the carbon on the Earth, biomass and post-biomass, the oil reserves,
everything, there would still 75% of the oxygen in the atmosphere.
Unfortunately, they fail to take certain things into account. For
example:
Today we sit, and if you knew what we went through to get this
acknowledged in the world press (And it would take me an hour to tell you), but
we now have it publicly acknowledged by NASA that we have between a 2.3% and
6.6% depletion in world wide atmospheric ozone depending on latitude and time of
year. This not taking into account the rather large depression over
Antarctica.
When this level of ozone depletion occurs, the level of
Ultra-violet influx increases the probability of Photosynthesis in the lower
atmosphere. So, the O/2 is preferentially converted into H/2O/3 for example.
This would normally only appear in great quantities after a lighting storm in
the past.
We have a lot of H/2O/3 in the atmosphere. We have a lot
of O/3 in the Troposphere, which until very recently was being attributed to
internal combustion. But O/3 was appearing in large quantities in rural areas
where there was very little internal combustion, relatively speaking. It became
an embarrassment when the Department of Agriculture had to admit that 2.6
Billion worth of crops were being destroyed per year by ozone alone.
So
the photosynthetic reaction that is occurring as the result of increased
Ultra-violet influx must be taken into account if we are going to begin to
understand what is going to be sustainable in terms of oxygen tensions. It is
the mixture of gases that rise from the Biosphere through the Troposphere and
into the stratosphere, that determines the tension of ozone, O/3.
The Nimbus satellite, by the way which NASA has conveniently said
is out of calibration even though it was in fine calibration last September, and
in almost perfect agreement with the instrumentation on the ground in
Antarctica. Which by the way at the center of the Antarctic hole, six miles up,
we had 96% depletion levels last year. (1987) The jumpsuits worn by some of my
friends from the Center for Atmospheric Research, please understand there are a
lot of good people there, people there I respect a lot, their nylon jumpsuits
were actually degraded by Ultra-violet exposure in just one flight. Several
people had serious eye injuries.
Now anybody who is going to suggest
that this type of influx is not going to effect the species of molecules that we
have in the atmosphere, and the mixture of those gases, is denying an extremely
important fact. So whereas I’m not suggesting we’re all going to die of anoxia,
what’s going to happen when the phytoplankton in the oceans die? They are the
basis of the entire oceanic food chain. If you are not familiar with them, they
are the little critters that actually made all this possible. This conference
would not be occurring today without their sponsorship.
I think we need to realize that we are
sponsored by living things, and we need to support them so they can support us.
Does that answer your question?
Yes, Thanks.
It occurs to
me that the resurrection of Nikola Tesla’s vision and other people who have had
the vision of the quantum ether, may yet be called on for a second offering. I
think it’s a good time to invest in this second offering of free energy. We did
not invest the last time and now we are paying for it. I don’t want to see
anybody suffer. What will it be like in ten years, when already the American
Cancer Society says that even with sunscreen protection ratings of 15 SPF,
direct sun exposure should be limited to an hour?
I hope the Tesla
Society will prosper, and move into a new age of manufacturing, implementation
and further Development. I want what has happened so far top be totally obsolete
in ten years. One kilowatt in your pocket, why not?
There is absolutely
no reason why not. You’ve got ten to the ninety-fourth power, grams per cubic
centimeter energy equivalent field. It’s not in a great big area, but it’s a Lot
of energy. If we can just scrape the surface, ever so slightly, we would never
have to worry about it again.
That’s what Nikola Tesla was scheduled to
tell Franklin Delanor Roosevelt back in 1943. In 1943 he had proposed to FDR
that perhaps we should look carefully at the fact that we can get all the energy
we need from any space we happen to be in.
He didn’t show up for his
meeting with the president. He was found dead in his apartment, “Natural
causes.”
There is some suspicion that maybe his visionary paranoia of
poisoning was not exactly paranoia, ... but premonition.
I have never
mentioned this before, but when I spoke at the 1981 Conference at the University
of Toronto, a detective, an older gentleman from New York, with a heavy New York
accent, approached me afterwards and said that he was a detective at the time
when Tesla had been found dead, and said he was involved with the investigation.
He said for National Security reasons, that
nobody was to know that the Coroners report had indicated he had been
poisoned.
I have never personally read the Coroner’s report, but the man
was about the right age. He showed me a badge and I had no reason to doubt this
man who had come all the way up to Toronto from New York, just to tell somebody
after all those years.
The Coroner’s report did say he had been poisoned.
Now it turns out that the only medium to my knowledge it actually cites that
Tesla had been poisoned is the Yugoslavian film on Nikola Tesla called, “The
Secret of Nikola Tesla.” So everybody can rewatch the introduction, because they
say it right at the beginning. And they also say perhaps that he was killed by
the Nazi’s.
I did not really want to mention all this, but science cannot
exist in an environment where science is not allowed to grow.
Any other
questions? Well you have all been a tremendously patient group, Thank you for
your attention.
Thank you Adam.
-----------------
More recent info on these
new-energy technologies developments are summarized in articles with links for
more info at
See March 9, 2002, article on
"sonofusion" for first refereed science publication on verification of
previously mislabeled "cold fusion" phenomena.
See http://www.cheniere.org for info on recently
patently Motionless Electromagnetic Generator developed by US Army Lt Col (ret)
Thomas Bearden
|
