REPP logo banner adsolstice ad
site map
Google Search REPP WWW register comment
home
repp
energy and environment
discussion groups
calendar
gem
about us
employment
 
REPP-CREST
1612 K Street, NW
Suite 202
Washington, DC 20006
contact us
discussion groups
efficiencyefficiency hydrogenhydrogen solarsolar windwind geothermalgeothermal bioenergybioenergy hydrohydro policypolicy
Green-power Archive for June 2002
11 messages, last added Tue Nov 26 17:19:06 2002

[Date Index][Thread Index]

GP: Adding Renewables to the Grid



(This is intended for the list-serve.)

The current green power paradigm is limited by the
fact consumers are buying power from existing
renewables sources. If demand goes up with a fixed
supply, first the prices go up. If the prices go up
enough, then developers will add new renewable
supplies. This is a long process that presumes a high
enough price will not be too high to scare away
customers.

The problem is that most honest-to-goodness renewables
(natural gas is a fossil fuel and hydro is not
something we need more of on any scale) are
subsidized. Subsidies are defined here as mandatory
taxes or mandatory rate payer fees, where consumers
have to comply. If green power were to do away with
the need for subsidies, the price for renewables would
arguably need to be 50% higher than traditional rates
to encourage development on a sizeable scale.

If therefor green power can not do away with the need
for subsidies (which is my contention), then we are
back at square one waiting for more subsidies. The
problem here is that today's system benefit charges
are targeted largely to improve reliability, and much
less for the environment, so don't hold your breadth.

The solution I believe is to give consumers a choice
to donate a small monthly amount (~$5) on their
utility bill, which is aggregated to directly offset
the first cost of additional renewables. By lowering
the first cost, the renewable power plant can then
sell power at market price, and remain solvent.
Today's green power paradigm asks consumers to pay a
premium for renewables that were largely subsidized,
and again does not directly encourage new renewables.

I sadly feel we can kiss subsidies (mandatory taxes
and fees) to offset renewable good bye, at least on
any sizeable scale.

To the extent anyone reads this list-serve, any
thoughts?

Bob

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! - Official partner of 2002 FIFA World Cup
http://fifaworldcup.yahoo.com

____________________________________________________________________________
This discussion group is sponsored in part by: 
  * Center for Renewable Energy and Sustainable Technology, http://www.crest.org
  * Global Environmental Options, http://www.geonetwork.org
Archives and related documents can be found at at: http://www.green-power.com