REPP logo banner adsolstice ad
site map
Google Search REPP WWW register comment
home
repp
energy and environment
discussion groups
calendar
gem
about us
employment
 
REPP-CREST
1612 K Street, NW
Suite 202
Washington, DC 20006
contact us
discussion groups
efficiencyefficiency hydrogenhydrogen solarsolar windwind geothermalgeothermal bioenergybioenergy hydrohydro policypolicy
Greenbuilding Archive for January 2001
448 messages, last added Tue Nov 26 17:24:58 2002

[Date Index][Thread Index]

GBlist: lighting



I've been reading over the 12v and cfl comments and looking over some of the literature I have on hand and all I want to say is I'm dissapointed in all the comments. Maybe frustrated is a more accurate comment. I'm disturbed by inaccuracies like 'transformers sucking energy' and 'bulbs burning out' - this kind of advice needs to be qualified if it is advice.
 
Lighting efficiently may equate with using lights efficiently but does not always equate with using 'efficient' lighting products. CFL's are not a universal answer and despite the transition to electronic ballasting its a far from perfected product and the good ones are not inexpensive solutions in themselves - and then getting them to work well in a space with all the right checks and balances is not an easy project unless the end result is a grossly overlit or poorly lit space (not much efficiency there). Same is basically true of all the other options. I'm tending to look at lighting control as being more of a solution - providing specific levels of lighting for specific uses - reducing wattage levels to 5% for passage through a room is ultimately more efficient than an efficient bulb at full wattage.
 
Its a design problem, not just a product solution - not yet anyway. And only because the damm stuff is so complex it takes a designer to wade through it all.
 
John Salmen
TERRAIN E.D.S.