 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| |
REPP-CREST
1612 K Street, NW
Suite 202
Washington, DC 20006
contact us
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
| Greenbuilding Archive for March 2001 |
 |
| 257 messages, last added Tue Nov 26 17:25:10 2002 |
[Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [GBlist] Legionella discussion
Whoa is right! Why do you deride John Herbert for raising public safety
concerns, based upon hard facts, while appearing to back the promoter of a
Combi that's illegal in many towns; dangerous in all?
Additionally, pressurized coils in poorly constructed slabs pose other
threats. Builders willing risk Legionella by cutting corners may do likewise
on slab-reinforcement.
For example, in the 1970's a large tract in Thousand Oaks, CA became
know as the "cracked-slab" area some years after an unscrupulous builder cut
coners on slab-reinforcement. Had these homes been heated by pressurized,
imbedded hydronic heating coils (then about 100 psi), it may have become
known as the cracked-slab-swamp.
=====================================================
Dr. Carmine Vasile, CEO
WaterFilm Energy Inc.,
P.O. Box 128
Medford, NY 11763
Voice: 631-758-6271 [Fax: 631-758-0438]
Email: gfx-ch@msn.com Web: http://oikos.com/gfx/
=====================================================
----- Original Message -----
From: "Sacie H Lambertson" <dlambert@grasshoppernet.com>
To: "John Herbert" <john.herbert@kelcroft.com>
Cc: <greenbuilding@crest.org>
Sent: Sunday, March 18, 2001 10:56 AM
Subject: Re: [GBlist] Legionella discussion
> Whoa there John Herbert, I suggest a modicum of politeness in this fairly
> anonymous forum will get you far more attention than the overly blunt tone
> adopted in your response to Speirag Alden's Legionella explication. Any
> long-time participant here knows that Speirag's messages are well written
> and well reasoned, postings that could set the standard for the rest us.
> When he makes a point about which there is debate or which is incorrect,
he
> is the first to admit it. Bluntly pointing out that he is wrong, snip,
> wrong, without any material to refute these and to give credence to your
> own assertions is completely useless as an argument. If you think Speirag
> is incorrect, then tell us why, don't just shout. It's personally as well
> as academically rude. Sacie Lambertson
______________________________________________________________________
This greenbuilding dialogue is sponsored by REPP/CREST, creator of
Solstice http://www.crest.org, and BuildingGreen, Inc., publisher of
Environmental Building News and GreenSpec http://www.BuildingGreen.com
______________________________________________________________________
 |
 |
|