 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| |
REPP-CREST
1612 K Street, NW
Suite 202
Washington, DC 20006
contact us
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
| Greenbuilding Archive for March 2001 |
 |
| 257 messages, last added Tue Nov 26 17:25:09 2002 |
[Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [GBlist] Passive Solar/Thermal Mass Comparison
Title: RE: [GBlist] Passive Solar/Thermal Mass Comparison
Mr
Alden is fond of reminding us that this is a climate-specific problem, and he is
right, in my estimation. Where exactly is the original querier? If you don't
warm up your mass and you live in VT, you're going to have cold feet (or worse)
in the winter. If you live in a predominantly heating climate, it is important
to insulate one's thermal mass on the outside. If you live in a predominantly
hot and humid climate, thermal mass won't help you much. If you live in an arid
desert like AZ, uninsulated thermal mass will help regulate your temperature
well. Others will, I am sure, comment on how exactly this
works.
I exchanged e-mails with a member of the Oak Ridge
staff. In a nutshell, thermal mass is beneficial in predominantly warm
clients, and he also said you'd be better off not heating up the mass to begin
with. In other words, my money would be better spent on less mass and
more R-value. But that's primarily because I live in AZ I think.
|
 |
|