REPP logo banner adsolstice ad
site map
Google Search REPP WWW register comment
home
repp
energy and environment
discussion groups
calendar
gem
about us
employment
 
REPP-CREST
1612 K Street, NW
Suite 202
Washington, DC 20006
contact us
discussion groups
efficiencyefficiency hydrogenhydrogen solarsolar windwind geothermalgeothermal bioenergybioenergy hydrohydro policypolicy
Greenbuilding Archive for March 2001
257 messages, last added Tue Nov 26 17:25:09 2002

[Date Index][Thread Index]

[GBlist] Climate Treaty/ CO2 / Arsenic cuts <FYI>




For those of you who enjoyed Bill Moyers report on Monday...

-------
>>>>
U.S. Won't Implement Climate Treaty

March 28, 2001

By JOHN HEILPRIN
Associated Press Writer

WASHINGTON (AP) via NewsEdge Corporation -

The Bush administration has no plans to
implement the climate treaty negotiated in
Kyoto, Japan, because it's clear Congress won't
ratify it anyway, the chief of the Environmental
Protection Agency said Tuesday.

``We have no interest in implementing that
treaty,'' EPA Administrator Christy Whitman told
reporters, although she said the president
continues to believe that global warming is an
issue of concern.

She said the administration will remain
``engaged'' in international negotiations on ways
to address climate change. But it was unclear
what position the administration intends to take
to the next United Nations meeting on the Kyoto
accords, scheduled for this summer.

Whitman repeatedly noted that the Senate
voted 95-0 against the United States taking any
action on climate change unless developing
countries also take some measures to reduce
heat-trapping ``greehouse'' gases, which are
mainly carbon dioxide from burning fossil fuels.

The Kyoto agreement calls for industrial nations
to reduce emissions _ at least for the time being.
The United States would be required to cut
emissions about a third by 2012.

Bush on a number of occasions has expressed his
opposition to the Kyoto accord, which the
Clinton administration had viewed as essential to
dealing with the risks of climate change.

Whitman noted that no other industrial country
has ratified the agreement. ``We are not the
only ones who have problems with it,'' Whitman
said.

Three weeks ago, Whitman in a memo urged
Bush to continue to recognize global warming as
a serious concern, arguing that to back away
from the issue would be damaging both
domestically and internationally.

``Mr. President, this is a credibility issue for the
U.S. in the international community. It is also an
issue that is resonating here at home,'' she
wrote in the March 6 memo. ``We need to
appear engaged.''

The memo came a week before Bush announced
he would not endorse legislation regulating
carbon dioxide, reversing a position he had taken
during his presidential campaign.

On Thursday, Whitman defended the memo.

``My job as the administrator of the
Environmental Protection Agency and as a
member of the Cabinet is to provide the
president with my best take and what I think is
in his best interest,'' she said.

``He has the broad picture and he needs to
make a decision based on all the factors that he
sees that I don't take into account as the
administrator of the EPA,'' she continued. ``I am
fully comfortable with his decision on this.''

Sen. John F. Kerry, D-Mass., a leading advocate
of the need to address global warming, said that
the White House had undermined Whitman.

He said, ``The question is being asked: Does
she speak for the administration, and will she be
able to enforce environmental laws and seek
others where necessary?''


# # #
<<<<

In Balance, Ms Whitman appears continuing to try and talk some sense into Administration...

>>>>
US EPA chief urged Bush not to break
pledge on cutting emissions

March 28, 2001

Washington, March 27 (AP) - Environmental
Protection Agency chief Christie Whitman told
President Bush a week before he broke a
campaign promise to reduce carbon dioxide
emissions that such a move would undermine this
country's world reputation, The Washington Post
said.

The warning came in a March 6 memo in which
Whitman wrote, "I would strongly recommend
that you continue to recognize global warming is
a real and serious issue," the newspaper said in
Tuesday's editions.

"Mr. President, this is a credibility issue for the
U.S. in the international community," the memo
added. "It is also an issue that is resonating here
at home. We need to appear engaged."

One week after the memo, Bush announced he
would not seek the carbon dioxide reductions.
Carbon dioxide is a gas that scientists say is a
major factor in the earth's rising temperatures.

Those who have worked with Whitman on the
issue of global warming said she was undermined
by the decision.

"I respect Christie enormously, but I think the
administration undermined her," said Sen. John F.
Kerry, D-Mass., a leading advocate of the need
to address global warming. "The question is being
asked: Does she speak for the administration,
and will she be able to enforce environmental
laws and seek others where necessary?"

Whitman refused to comment Monday to the
Post. Her spokesman said the memo was a
confidential correspondence between Whitman
and the president, and that she would not be
willing to discuss it.

However, interviewed Tuesday on ABC's "Good
Morning America," Whitman said she does not
believe her credibility has been undermined.

"He said global climate change is an issue in
which we need to be engaged internationally,"
Whitman said of Bush. "He is very committed to
that decision. ... The international community
understands that."

She also defended Bush's decision to roll back a
Clinton administration regulation that would have
reduced from 50 parts per billion to 10 parts per
billion the amount of arsenic allowed in drinking
water. "The previous administration didn't take
the time to fully understand the impact of this
decision in those areas of the country where you
have a great deal of naturally occurring arsenic,"
Whitman said.

The reduction would not have taken effect until
2006, she said. "We will have a new standard by
2006 (and) it will certainly be well below 50"
parts per billion.

# # #


<<<<




______________________________________________________________________ This greenbuilding dialogue is sponsored by REPP/CREST, creator of Solstice http://www.crest.org, and BuildingGreen, Inc., publisher of Environmental Building News and GreenSpec http://www.BuildingGreen.com ______________________________________________________________________