REPP logo banner adsolstice ad
site map
Google Search REPP WWW register comment
home
repp
energy and environment
discussion groups
calendar
gem
about us
employment
 
REPP-CREST
1612 K Street, NW
Suite 202
Washington, DC 20006
contact us
discussion groups
efficiencyefficiency hydrogenhydrogen solarsolar windwind geothermalgeothermal bioenergybioenergy hydrohydro policypolicy
Greenbuilding Archive for March 2001
257 messages, last added Tue Nov 26 17:25:09 2002

[Date Index][Thread Index]

[GBlist] Re: thermal mass



Sgrìobh Matthew Weinreb:

>If I understand correctly - in a 'moderate' climate (where you need heating
>for about 5 months of the year and the summer is HOT, but not hot enough
>that aircon or an equivalent is really needed..) a thermal mass interior of
>say 200mm thickness surrounded by an insulating thickness of say 200mm would
>be the ideal scenario -- ?  Perhaps a solid concrete wall insulated from the
>foundation and the exterior?

     I don't know about "ideal", but I think that would work fine.  In 
fact, I think it would work fine in just about any climate, for a 
continuously occupied structure.

     A note for comfort:  thermal mass will moderate temperature 
swings, but it doesn't feel comfortable to the touch unless you heat 
it.  A rock doesn't feel warm until it's above 90°F.  So if you don't 
heat a massive floor, you'll want throw rugs or slippers.

-Speireag.
-- 
Speireag Alden, aka Joshua Macdonald Alden

...the last word in ignorance is the man who says of an animal or 
plant: 'What good is it?' --Aldo Leopold, _A Sand County Almanac_ 

______________________________________________________________________
This greenbuilding dialogue is sponsored by REPP/CREST, creator of
Solstice http://www.crest.org, and BuildingGreen, Inc., publisher of
Environmental Building News and GreenSpec http://www.BuildingGreen.com
______________________________________________________________________