REPP logo banner adsolstice ad
site map
Google Search REPP WWW register comment
home
repp
energy and environment
discussion groups
calendar
gem
about us
employment
 
REPP-CREST
1612 K Street, NW
Suite 202
Washington, DC 20006
contact us
discussion groups
efficiencyefficiency hydrogenhydrogen solarsolar windwind geothermalgeothermal bioenergybioenergy hydrohydro policypolicy
Greenbuilding Archive for April 2001
307 messages, last added Tue Nov 26 17:25:16 2002

[Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [GBlist] Zero Energy House on Washington Mall (fwd)



     PORTION of previous POST....  Of course, Carmine was referring to a 
"local" efficiency,
Malcolm is correct, at the best plants in the world the overall
energy conversation efficiency is at best only 36%, mainly
due the primer mover loss and transmission losses.

Electric water heating is convenient to the home user,
but the overall efficiency is very, very low indeed.

Regards,
John Herbert
_______________
    if electrical resistive heat is the most expensive form, then, in the 
final end how is it efficient? I can understand easy, reliable, safer, less 
per unit bought, faster install, more versatile-- but I don't see the 
efficiency claim. At least based on BTUs-Watts.

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com


______________________________________________________________________
This greenbuilding dialogue is sponsored by REPP/CREST, creator of
Solstice http://www.crest.org, and BuildingGreen, Inc., publisher of
Environmental Building News and GreenSpec http://www.BuildingGreen.com
______________________________________________________________________