REPP logo banner adsolstice ad
site map
Google Search REPP WWW register comment
home
repp
energy and environment
discussion groups
calendar
gem
about us
employment
 
REPP-CREST
1612 K Street, NW
Suite 202
Washington, DC 20006
contact us
discussion groups
efficiencyefficiency hydrogenhydrogen solarsolar windwind geothermalgeothermal bioenergybioenergy hydrohydro policypolicy
Greenbuilding Archive for July 2001
332 messages, last added Tue Nov 26 17:25:39 2002

[Date Index][Thread Index]

[GBlist] The BlueGreen revolution & codes, recognition and support



Hi David,
 
The BlueGreen solution is an outstanding opportunity to completely eliminate the California Energy Crisis. Buildings can have conventional air-conditioning systems coupled to cold water district cooling. They then no longer use their chillers but tap into the infinitely large (by all standards this is an inexhaustible cold energy sink) offshore energy resource for cooling. This brings a direct 80 to 90% savings in energy expended to meet the demand. The next step is to build BlueGreen communities where buildings and residences use Liquid Cooling resources at the building envelop and plants to transform solar radiant energy into transpired vapor that is condensed to generate generous supplies of fresh water - and at the same time produce biomass to energy and/food and other kinds of plant products.
 
The solaroof is a transparent Liquid-Cooled roof construction. The solaroofgarden places green plants at the roof level, where they are grown using advanced hydroponic and controlled atmosphere (enriched CO2) production systems.
See further detail as www.solaroofgareden.com
 
Thus far I have absolute silence from public officials and authorities, while at the GrassRoots level the message is going out and many are beginning to ask the inevitable questions that reflect poorly on those in authority and the industrial complex that apparently want us to continue to expend billions to obtain cooling that is (like solar) FREE and at hand and can be accessed at a fraction of the cost of the commercial products. These products and the utilities that power them reap a huge profit at the expense of the environment.
 
Wake up! Go stick your toes in the water along any of the beaches of California!  What we have here is a new California Cold Rush! This Cold Rush will again  make California the place of opportunity and growth but at the same time return to Californians the opportunity to develop a pristine environment. Below is a request for support to get this message out. Please let me here back from you and those of your associates who, from their positions of trust and leadership can do so much to build the coming BlueGreen revolution.
 
For you information I have attached these comments from the source of the BlueGreen revolution:
 
On July 20, 2001 Dr.Jack R. Davidson CEO of the Common Heritage Corporation,
Keahole point in Kona, Hawaii wrote, quote:

Richard,
I had time to reread your emails again this morning and to visit your web site.
It looks like we are on the same track in trying to build sustainable habitats
and sustainable communities.  Common Heritage Corporation believes the use
of the cold deep ocean water has great potential for improving lives of people
(particularly the poor) living in the coastal deserts of the world.  Our primary
mission is to get these innovations utilized for the benefit of such people.
We have put a great deal of our efforts to this point in demonstrating these
possibilities. As you know from our web site, we maintain a demonstration
facility at Keahole point in Kona, Hawaii.
 
Within the suite of technologies that have been developed is the capacity to
substitute for large amounts of electricity used for air conditioning and industrial
cooling at great cost savings in both developing and developed countries. 
To this end I gave a paper titled "California's Energy Future and Cold Ocean
Water" at the Pacific Congress on Ocean Science and Technology Conference in
San Francisco on July 9.  I was hoping that the paper might strike up a cord
in line with California's energy woes. I'd hoped it might get some attention
in the press.  Unfortunately there was no press at the conference sessions.
I note you have recognized this potential for cooling California communities
in the sidebar items on your web page under "Green Energy" and "energy solutions".

 
...The coast down from San Francisco through Monterey has very cold surface
water (8 to 12 degree C).  I was unable to find any information on temperatures
below the surface for this area.  I had a lot on my plate at the time I was
trying to write the paper and didn't have the time to research this thoroughly.
Anyway if it is even a few degrees lower than the surface temperature it would
not be necessary to go down to 2000 feet or more to get the Arctic water we
can access in the rest of the ocean. The potential saving of electricity and
environmental costs are enormous even with long cold ocean supply lines.  In
the case of communities like Santa Cruz and Santa Clara it may be available
at a fraction of the costs since these long pipes would not be needed.
 
The state of California is not only one of the greatest economies in the world,
it is also has one of the greatest bureaucracies.  We could probably spend
the rest of our lives getting the state to give attention to this opportunity.
On the other hand California coastal communities are pretty "Green" minded.
Of course they will panic into non-green energy solutions (perhaps even nuclear)
like any other group if faced with turning off their amenities.  On the other
hand they are probably the most apt to listen if there is a "green solution."
with major cost and environmental benefits.  So a package with cold ocean water
and your technologies might have a great attraction to these communities. 
It would seem that if Cornell University is foresighted enough and capable of
moving to a long term green solution these communities should be.  They've
been in operation a year now.  So how do we go about getting their attention? 
 
  end quote.
 
You can see from this authoritative source that the energy solution for California's
energy problem is close at hand indeed. I estimate the ultimate reduction of
supply (while serving the same demand) would conservatively be 20,000 Megawatts
of the peak production that would be avoided.  The blackouts represent a shortage
of about 5,000 Megawatts - therefore current production need not be expanded.
No massive power plan construction program is required. This is truly important
and Californians deserve to be informed at a GrassRoots level. Please help!

 
Richard Nelson
Telephone: 514-696-9655
Fax: 514-696-6998
Email:
rick@solaroofgarden.com
WebSite:
http://www.solaroofgarden.com
BUILDING a sustainable future