REPP logo banner adsolstice ad
site map
Google Search REPP WWW register comment
home
repp
energy and environment
discussion groups
calendar
gem
about us
employment
 
REPP-CREST
1612 K Street, NW
Suite 202
Washington, DC 20006
contact us
discussion groups
efficiencyefficiency hydrogenhydrogen solarsolar windwind geothermalgeothermal bioenergybioenergy hydrohydro policypolicy
Greenbuilding Archive for October 2001
221 messages, last added Tue Nov 26 17:26:03 2002

[Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [GBlist] Re: Big Green: Radiant Floor Heating



Mike said -
 
I'm skeptical about the TekFoil.  Radiant barriers work best for radiant flow.  We're primarily concerned about the conduction losses from the slab to the ground.  Plus, I don't understand how the installer could specify this product when he just got just saying he doesn't want to use poly.  I suspect the bubble wrap and foil sandwich probably has a perm rating as low of the poly.  Why would it be ok if the poly isn't (of course, the poly is ok.  I'm just wondering about what appears to be a logical inconsistency.
 
Frazer says -
 
It was me that said NO poly, based upon Lstiburek's argument that the slab should be able to dry to both the inside and to the outside. It is the radiant installer who wants poly & TekFoil. SO I think he is confused - 1) TekFoil is a vapor retarder, 2) it's function is radiant barrier and 3) for the same cost, he ought to be recommending another 2" of rigid foam.
 
PS: Isn't Dow board (or the pink or green stuff) vapor permeable or semi-vapor permeable and since moisture vapor flows from warm to cold, isn't poly, possibly as Lstiburek says, 'counterproductive' ??
-------------------------------------
Frazer Dougherty
North Fork Retrofit & Solar Options
Mail: Box 4016, East Hampton, NY 11937
Shipping: 75 Industrial Rd, Wainscott, NY 11975
tel.  631.537.1654
fax. 631.537.1637
cel. 631-645-3534
www.home-performance.org
www.solaroptions.com
Insight '00 #1048, citrus yellow, 61.1 lmpg