REPP logo banner adsolstice ad
site map
Google Search REPP WWW register comment
home
repp
energy and environment
discussion groups
calendar
gem
about us
employment
 
REPP-CREST
1612 K Street, NW
Suite 202
Washington, DC 20006
contact us
discussion groups
efficiencyefficiency hydrogenhydrogen solarsolar windwind geothermalgeothermal bioenergybioenergy hydrohydro policypolicy
Greenbuilding Archive for January 2002
564 messages, last added Tue Nov 26 17:26:29 2002

[Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [GBlist] tar-paper for roofing



If you are trying to avoid the heat buildup from the Texas sun, doesn't the radiant foil barrier have to be on the top side?
Bob Jordan
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 12:23 PM
Subject: Re: [GBlist] tar-paper for roofing

When the sheathing is applied to the roof the shiny side faces down. The difference in price between standard sheathing and the sheathing with the foil already applied is only around five dollars per 4X8 sheet. It may be slightly more temperature efficient to apply a radiant barrier on the underside of the rafters when new but after a short time it is coated by dust and would not be advantageous. The labor cost on the other hand would cause people to just leave it out of construction all together.
The temperature difference in an attic here in South Texas utilizing this type of product vs. one that does not is amazing.
The greatest amount of heat gain is through the roof making this product cost and actually effective, reduces the demand for electricity, and most important, saleable to people building a home that would not consider green building products. Until a green building product is in use, it isn't actually a green building product.
So the answer to the question is, no, it still works. Although it would work better with one, if you can keep the radiant barrier clean.
 
Doesn't there need to be an air space between the radiant barrier and the tar paper for the radiant barrier to work?
Bob Jordan