REPP logo banner adsolstice ad
site map
Google Search REPP WWW register comment
home
repp
energy and environment
discussion groups
calendar
gem
about us
employment
 
REPP-CREST
1612 K Street, NW
Suite 202
Washington, DC 20006
contact us
discussion groups
efficiencyefficiency hydrogenhydrogen solarsolar windwind geothermalgeothermal bioenergybioenergy hydrohydro policypolicy
Greenbuilding Archive for January 2002
564 messages, last added Tue Nov 26 17:26:29 2002

[Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [GBlist] radiant barrier for cold climes WAS tar-paper



 I can not answer that question for you but would think you would want the heat gain we want to reject.
The air space may be the same answer as the tar paper. Here, any rejection of heat gain is a gain for us.
Our home energy dollars are spent on cooling not heating.
You have to deal with ground heaving from frost, most of us, ocassionaly have to scrape frost from our car windows, if we leave them outside overnight. You bury your home water pipes deep under ground, sometimes we have to wrap a wash rag around our spigots to prevent freeze damage. Here if the temperature drops to 32F you would think we were under attack, they ask us not to drive and to stay home and not go to work.
So I do not know if it is conflicting information or just information adjusted for different climates.
Clark
I've been getting conflicting information re radiant barriers. Are they useful in cold climates (VT/NH). At the moment it seems as if it is not cost-effective.
 
Need to have at air space (3 inches is most common recommendation) between itself and warm air space wall/ceiling. Then pile on insulation. It is difficult to retrofit a house with these specs, and not cost-effective.
 
-- gilbert midonnet