REPP logo banner adsolstice ad
site map
Google Search REPP WWW register comment
home
repp
energy and environment
discussion groups
calendar
gem
about us
employment
 
REPP-CREST
1612 K Street, NW
Suite 202
Washington, DC 20006
contact us
discussion groups
efficiencyefficiency hydrogenhydrogen solarsolar windwind geothermalgeothermal bioenergybioenergy hydrohydro policypolicy
Greenbuilding Archive for January 2002
564 messages, last added Tue Nov 26 17:26:28 2002

[Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [GBlist] monster houses (swelling/shrinking)




>
>we spent some time deciding/discussing a priori what kind of square
>footage we could probably do fine with as "green" Americans.  200 square
>feet per inhabitant?  300? 400?  I think we could also afford to spell
>out why such a number might be either appropriate or out of the question.
>It just might be revealing.

I think it's interesting in this discussion to look at the sizes of 
apartments in NYC, where economic necessity requires small footprints for 
most residents. You could look at these spaces with two things in mind: the 
size that people are able to live in, and the observation that nearly 
everyone complains about that size.

( bear in mind that the "net" square footage sizes don't include necessary 
common elements like stairways, elevators, mechanical rooms, common laundry 
rooms, etc.)

David Bergman
David Bergman Architect/Fire & Water Lighting + Furniture
bergman@cyberg.com    http://www.cyberg.com
t 212 475 3106    f 212 677 7291


______________________________________________________________________
This greenbuilding dialogue is sponsored by REPP/CREST, creator of
Solstice http://www.crest.org, and BuildingGreen, Inc., publisher of
Environmental Building News and GreenSpec http://www.BuildingGreen.com
______________________________________________________________________