REPP logo banner adsolstice ad
site map
Google Search REPP WWW register comment
home
repp
energy and environment
discussion groups
calendar
gem
about us
employment
 
REPP-CREST
1612 K Street, NW
Suite 202
Washington, DC 20006
contact us
discussion groups
efficiencyefficiency hydrogenhydrogen solarsolar windwind geothermalgeothermal bioenergybioenergy hydrohydro policypolicy
Greenbuilding Archive for January 2002
564 messages, last added Tue Nov 26 17:26:26 2002

[Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [GBlist] Fw: A carbon based built environment



Living in a region that is thick with concrete plants I would be very interested in your source or your findings about the damage concrete plants do to the environment.  Can you please cite your source or provide any information?
 
 One obvious damage done by these plants is that they quite literally chew the hills away our limestone here.  Once they start a 1200 foot tall hill can be leveled flat in five years by these guys.  God knows what happens to the flora and fauna that once resided on that hill.  It can be very ugly.
 
SBT Designs
25840 IH-10 West #1
Boerne, Texas 78006
210-698-7109
FAX: 210-698-7147
www.sbtdesigns.com
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Saturday, January 19, 2002 7:15 PM
Subject: [GBlist] Fw: A carbon based built environment

 
Some three or four years ago I found amongst some back issues of Environmental Building News a copy of an article about how disastrous Portland cement is on the environment.  As well as the noise and dust, according to many authors over 10% of anthropogenic CO2 comes from this source.

The article really inspired me and since that time I have been working on a carbon based cementitious material. It seemed logical to me that the way to stop global warming and climate change was to do what nature has done for billions of years and create our own built environment using carbon dioxide as a source molecule.

Over two or three years we found ways of making the technology work and are now producing bricks, blocks and pavers on an experimental basis. What is exciting is that the bricks utilise well over 90% of a wide range of wastes and are CO2 neutral or even a net sink. The potential sequestration is enormous. Even though we know that there are over 1.8 billion tonnes of Portland cement produced globally each year we do not know how many billion tonnes of clay bricks and other materials that could potentially be replaced are produced so we cannot give an accurate overall figure.  According to the Australian Federal department of Industry Science and Resources in a document titled “Building for Growth. An Analysis of the Australian Building and Construction Industries ”buildings are responsible for some 30 per cent of the raw materials we use, 42 percent of the energy and 40 per cent of the air emissions. So what we do know is that it would be several billion tonnes. I think we have developed what is probably the most important technology this milleneum

We believe that we will be successful because so much less energy is required to make the new eco-cement resulting in a very low cost base.
 
If any readers are interested or can help with statistics etc. more detail are on our web site at www.tececo.com
 
John Harrison
TecEco Pty. Ltd.
497 Main Road
Glenorchy TAS 7010
Ph 61 3 62492352 (am, weekends & evenings)
Ph 61 3 62734747 (pm, weekdays)
Fx 62730010