 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| |
REPP-CREST
1612 K Street, NW
Suite 202
Washington, DC 20006
contact us
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
| Greenbuilding Archive for January 2002 |
 |
| 564 messages, last added Tue Nov 26 17:26:26 2002 |
[Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [GBlist] burning wood, was RFH and back-up system
Why not? We are feeding direct power productions from Solar roof systems
here directly into the power system and running our electric heaters using
that power. Its supplementing the grid - We can even use it to run the
meter backwards -
-----Original Message-----
From: Steven Shepard [mailto:sbtdesigns@earthlink.net]
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 11:13 AM
To: Tawney, Patricia - PNG-1; 'Ralph Bicknese'; Sacie H Lambertson
Cc: greenbuilding@crest.org
Subject: Re: [GBlist] burning wood, was RFH and back-up system
The main flaw in your entire statement is we would never use PV for heat.
SBT Designs
25840 IH-10 West #1
Boerne, Texas 78006
210-698-7109
FAX: 210-698-7147
www.sbtdesigns.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tawney, Patricia - PNG-1" <pjtawney@bpa.gov>
To: "'Ralph Bicknese'" <ralph.bicknese@christnerinc.com>; "Sacie H
Lambertson" <dlambert@grasshoppernet.com>
Cc: <greenbuilding@crest.org>
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 1:01 PM
Subject: RE: [GBlist] burning wood, was RFH and back-up system
> Just a question - I appreciate that the Sun is renewable - but I don't
> believe the plastic or other component parts in a Photovoltaics system are
> either renewable or recycled while trees, when properly managed, grow
back,
> right? The smoke that comes from burning actually is a natural component
> part of an eco-system, containing much of the same qualities as wood
> produces when it rots what will become of old Photovoltaic components?
Our
> citites are polluted because we drive cars in them, not because of wood
> burns and the dangerous health impact of the two pollutants are
> significantly different isn't it? I have a bias I admit. But as I
> understand it while wood produces more particulates (which eventually
return
> to earth and become part of the planet) the fumes from cattle and cars
> contain chemicals that are poisonous and will remain so. I also have 40
> acres of trees, and live in an area with a population of 5,000 (about half
> are horses). But still - If you want to clean up the planet focus on
cars,
> exploding populations and commercial cattle production - because both are
> causing sick air and aren't a natural part of the eco-system. Trees have
> always burned and in fact actually burn less now then they use to. We may
> actually be hurting the planet when we don't let forests fire burn. I
think
> things like Photovoltaics come into the sustainability question only for
> those electrical uses that we can't live without - like brain scans and
hot
> water. Using Photovoltaics for this to off set use of goal or other big
> polluters makes sense but comparing it to wood heat - doesn't wash. Just
a
> thought.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ralph Bicknese [mailto:ralph.bicknese@christnerinc.com]
> Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 7:13 AM
> To: Sacie H Lambertson
> Cc: greenbuilding@crest.org
> Subject: RE: [GBlist] burning wood, was RFH and back-up system
>
>
> Sacie:
>
> I really appreciate your input. I am sorry if I came off a bit strong on
> the issue of wood vs renewable sources. That was not my intent. I know
from
> your posts and off-post conversations we have had you are very dedicated
to
> sustainability. I just wanted to point out the moral dilemma I wrestled
> with and that I choose not to install a wood stove and have planned for
the
> installation of photovoltaics (or other) when it becomes realistic for me
to
> do so. I am sorry if my posted suggested I was questioning your morals. I
> do not and very much respect your ethics regarding sustainability.
>
> Cheers,
> Ralph Bicknese
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sacie H Lambertson [mailto:dlambert@grasshoppernet.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2002 9:00 PM
> To: greenbuilding@crest.org
> Subject: [GBlist] burning wood, was RFH and back-up system
>
> Several have responded to the suggestion that it might be considered
> slightly immoral to burn wood, or at the least, that the practice is
> ungreen. In some parts of the country where the population is more
crowded
> and where wood stoves are most commonly used, there can be a polutant
> problem--eg in Missoula Mt.--or where there are temperature inversions,
> such as Denver Colo., but here on 80 acres of mostly trees in NE Kansas in
> a county of 14,000 people, I don't worry too much about it. Not many
folks
> in Kansas use wood as there sole source of heat.
> Furthermore, I know even the most efficient wood burning stove is
> not
> terribly efficient, but for us the fuel is free, the cutting of it is what
> I like best to do in the winter, (we have a log splitter), and most
> importantly, the trees on this land need desperately to be thinned to
allow
> some to grow tall and straight and large. We are very good keepers of our
> land and I'm afraid I have no apologies for using the wood on it this way;
> aside from the aesthetics of the practice, we are greatly improving our
> property. BTW, our nearest neighbor is 1/2 mile away as the crow flies.
> Sacie Lambertson
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This greenbuilding dialogue is sponsored by REPP/CREST, creator of
> Solstice http://www.crest.org, and BuildingGreen, Inc., publisher of
> Environmental Building News and GreenSpec http://www.BuildingGreen.com
> ______________________________________________________________________
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This greenbuilding dialogue is sponsored by REPP/CREST, creator of
> Solstice http://www.crest.org, and BuildingGreen, Inc., publisher of
> Environmental Building News and GreenSpec http://www.BuildingGreen.com
> ______________________________________________________________________
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This greenbuilding dialogue is sponsored by REPP/CREST, creator of
> Solstice http://www.crest.org, and BuildingGreen, Inc., publisher of
> Environmental Building News and GreenSpec http://www.BuildingGreen.com
> ______________________________________________________________________
>
______________________________________________________________________
This greenbuilding dialogue is sponsored by REPP/CREST, creator of
Solstice http://www.crest.org, and BuildingGreen, Inc., publisher of
Environmental Building News and GreenSpec http://www.BuildingGreen.com
______________________________________________________________________
 |
 |
|