 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| |
REPP-CREST
1612 K Street, NW
Suite 202
Washington, DC 20006
contact us
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
| Greenbuilding Archive for January 2002 |
 |
| 564 messages, last added Tue Nov 26 17:26:26 2002 |
[Date Index][Thread Index]
[GBlist] DCAT Survey Release!
Friends,
I hope yoiu find the following announcement and referenced survey results as
exciting as we do!
best wishes,
Tony Novelli
*************
Please help us spread the word about this report!
[please excuse the cross-posting]
The Development Center for Appropriate Technology (DCAT) is pleased
to annouce the publication of the results of a survey assessing the
regulatory barriers to more sustainable building and development,
commonly called green building. The survey collected information from
people who seek code approval for construction plans ("code users")
and code officials who approve or deny those plans. The goal was to
assess both groups' experience with green building and building
codes. The results revealed that building codes frequently present
barriers to the approval of green building alternatives. Those
barriers are both technical and non-technical in nature. Both groups
of respondents overwhelmingly indicated that supporting information
for alternatives accompanying plans was the most significant factor
in gaining code approval. Non-technical factors were about as likely
to affect approval as conflicts with the intent of the code. The
survey report concludes with a set of recommended strategies for
gaining approval and recommendations for training of both code users
and code officials.
Three conclusions drawn from the survey results demonstrate where
further work is needed to facilitate the chances of code approval of
green building:
* Applications are more likely to be denied if they are in clear
conflict with the intent of the code or if they lack sufficient
supporting information about the green product, material, system, or
design to satisfy safety concerns.
* Both code officials and those who seek code approval for green
building considered an existing code provision more likely to
contribute to the approval of a green product, material, system, or
design application, but only code users considered a code provision
to contribute to the denial of such applications.
* Applications for green building approaches are avoided by
practitioners because supporting information will take too long to
acquire or does not exist.
The survey results also revealed strategies for green building
practitioners that enhance the approval rate of green building
approaches. The most important strategy is to provide supporting
technical information adequate to satisfy safety concerns. Additional
strategies are:
* Provide other information such as case studies of successful use of
the alternative and contact information for building officials
familiar with the alternative.
* Start the process early.
* Involve building department staff early.
* Be persistent and patient.
The survey report is available on the DCAT website at www.dcat.net.
For further information, please contact Loretta Ishida at (520)
624-6628 or loretta@dcat.net.
*************
Tony Novelli
Assistant Director
Development Center for Appropriate Technology
P.O. Box 27513
Tucson, Arizona 85726-7513 USA
(520) 624-6628
(520) 798-3701 Fax
<A HREF="http://www.dcat.net">http://www.dcat.net</A>
"If we could read the secret history of our enemies, we should find in each
person's life sorrow and suffering enough to disarm all hostility."
-Henry Wadsworth
Longfellow
______________________________________________________________________
This greenbuilding dialogue is sponsored by REPP/CREST, creator of
Solstice http://www.crest.org, and BuildingGreen, Inc., publisher of
Environmental Building News and GreenSpec http://www.BuildingGreen.com
______________________________________________________________________
 |
 |
|