 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| |
REPP-CREST
1612 K Street, NW
Suite 202
Washington, DC 20006
contact us
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
| Greenbuilding Archive for January 2002 |
 |
| 564 messages, last added Tue Nov 26 17:26:25 2002 |
[Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [GBlist] "Green" kitchen cabs
Rush and all;
The wheat board product I have used (and am very happy with) is called
EcoColors. They make both a straw based particleboard and a sunflower husk
board. The price list I have lists 1/2" thick wheat board at $131.00 per
4'x8' sheet for small quantities. The cost goes down to $118.00 per sheet
for 51-300 sheets. The sunflower board is $214.00 per 3'x8' sheet for small
quantities. Both boards are also offered in several other thicknesses.
Please check with the manufacturer for current pricing, options and the
environmental qualities and limitations of the product.
They also make other environmentally responsive wood panel products.
The manufacturer is:
Architectural Forest Products
San Francisco, CA
www.ecoforest.com
Cheers,
Ralph Bicknese
-----Original Message-----
From: Rush Dougherty [mailto:RushD45@earthlink.net]
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 12:37 PM
To: greenbuilding@crest.org
Subject: Re: [GBlist] "Green" kitchen cabs
did a little more research...
went to http://www.isobord.com/corporate.html
and saw that
"Together the companies applied for and received a United States patent in
1996 for the process technology of making a straw based engineered board
with isocyanate"
then I did a Goggle search on "Isocyanate", and came up with
http://www.epa.gov/ttn/uatw/hlthef/methylis.html
that says, among other statements, that
"No information is available on the assessment of personal exposure to
methyl isocyanate"
and that
"In 1984, in Bhopal, India, a Union Carbide gas leak of methyl isocyanate
resulted in the deaths of 2,000 people and adverse health effects in greater
than 170,000 survivors. Pulmonary edema was the cause of death in most
cases, with many deaths resulting from secondary respiratory infections such
as bronchitis and bronchial pneumonia"
and that
"EPA's Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, for a hazard ranking
under Section 112(g) of the Clean Air Act Amendments, considers methyl
isocyanate to be a "high concern" pollutant based on severe acute toxicity"
so, really, how 'green' is it? or is it just using a 'source' that we feel
is 'green' and using blatently a binder/glue agent to hold it together?
Rush
______________________________________________________________________
This greenbuilding dialogue is sponsored by REPP/CREST, creator of
Solstice http://www.crest.org, and BuildingGreen, Inc., publisher of
Environmental Building News and GreenSpec http://www.BuildingGreen.com
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
This greenbuilding dialogue is sponsored by REPP/CREST, creator of
Solstice http://www.crest.org, and BuildingGreen, Inc., publisher of
Environmental Building News and GreenSpec http://www.BuildingGreen.com
______________________________________________________________________
 |
 |
|