 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| |
REPP-CREST
1612 K Street, NW
Suite 202
Washington, DC 20006
contact us
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
| Greenbuilding Archive for February 2002 |
 |
| 458 messages, last added Tue Nov 26 17:26:37 2002 |
[Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Good news for
spray foam Corbond users (sorry, about the repost):
I wrote to Corbond
this summer about their use of GHG depleting blowing agents. Here is their
reply:
Steve
Steve:
We are
currently working on a new Corbond formula without the blowing agent 141B.
The new blowing agent made by Honeywell-General Electric is 245FA. We
currently have a prototype of the product and expect to have the replacement
version of Corbond ready sometime in 2003. If you have any further
questions, I am out of the office on sales trip but will be back in on Monday,
July 16th. Thank you for your interest.
Blair
Johnson
National Sales Manager
skp
Dear Corbond
You currently use 1,1-Dichloro-1-fluoroethane in
your product. As I understand, this gas is included in the accelerated
phase out schedule of the Montreal Protocol. By 2004, developed countries must
reduce their consumption of 1,1-dichloro-1-fluoroethane by 35 percent.
Under the Clean Air Act, there will be a ban on production and importing of
1,1-dichloro-1-fluoroethane effective January 1, 2003.
How will this affect your company? Do you
plan to use a benign substitute? I'd like to be able to recommend
Corbond, but need some information about your use of HCFCs.
Thanks,
Steve Hebden
Maintenance and Environment,
Weavers Way
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 10:50
PM
Subject: Re: [GBlist] insulation
on 02/25/2002 4:32 PM, Jan Fillinger at janfillinger@jb.com
wrote:
I am
interested in a high efficiency blown-in insulation for a cathedral ceilings
without ventilation. I know a little about Icynene, which has an
installer in our area (Eugene, OR). I just recently heard about
Air-Krete (cementitious) and about Corbond (polyurethane). Does anyone
know more about these or any other products that would be environmentally
(more) benign and provide more than R-5 per inch?
Thanks,
Jan Fillinger
Jan,
Of the 3
options, only Corbond will give you above R-5 per inch. I believe that
it’s not actually a polyurethane, but a polyisocyanurate, but the chemists
among us will need to clarify that. I used to use it a lot, before I
knew better. It’s a great insulation, but the blowing agent depletes
stratospheric ozone. Although the current blowing agents have greatly
reduced ozone depletion potential, they’re still powerful greenhouse gasses.
I know of one company doing high-density spray foam with
zero-ozone-depletion gasses: Foamtech of Vermont. Perhaps there are
others on your coast. We still use sprayed poly foam in rare cases, when
our preferred system, dense-packed cellulose, isn’t feasible. If you use
Corbond , one consolation for the blowing agents is the amount of energy, and
therefore greenhouse gasses, you’ll be able to save over the life of the
insulation job.
Best wishes,
David
-- Holland &
Foley Building Design L.L.C. 232 Beech Hill Rd. Northport, Maine 04849
USA p: (207) 338-9869 f: (207) 338-9859 e:
hollandfoley@acadia.net
|
 |
 |
|