REPP logo banner adsolstice ad
site map
Google Search REPP WWW register comment
home
repp
energy and environment
discussion groups
calendar
gem
about us
employment
 
REPP-CREST
1612 K Street, NW
Suite 202
Washington, DC 20006
contact us
discussion groups
efficiencyefficiency hydrogenhydrogen solarsolar windwind geothermalgeothermal bioenergybioenergy hydrohydro policypolicy
Greenbuilding Archive for February 2002
458 messages, last added Tue Nov 26 17:26:37 2002

[Date Index][Thread Index]

[GBlist] hardiplank



I work in the Washington, DC area.  I've been using Cemplank, a fiber cement
siding similar to Hardi, for four years now.  It's a little softer and more
fibrous, but the carpenters like it because it nails easier than Hardi.
(Hardi is more dense and brittle--if you use it, i recommend drilling pilot
holes before nailing.  I've done some unscientific testing on both products,
immersing unfinished samples in water for 30 days.  Hardi comes out
absolutely immuted--it seems to have the absorbtion capacity of a sheet of
glass.  Cemplank's surface seems to absorb a little, but not enough to
measurably swell the width or thickness of the panel.  Cemplank holds paint
tenaciously.

My working assumption that the limit of its service life will be the
substrate or the nail, not the product itself.

By the same token, red cedar shingles on houses built in the Teens and
Twenties are still going strong here.

Alan Abrams, AIBD


______________________________________________________________________
This greenbuilding dialogue is sponsored by REPP/CREST, creator of
Solstice http://www.crest.org, and BuildingGreen, Inc., publisher of
Environmental Building News and GreenSpec http://www.BuildingGreen.com
______________________________________________________________________