REPP logo banner adsolstice ad
site map
Google Search REPP WWW register comment
home
repp
energy and environment
discussion groups
calendar
gem
about us
employment
 
REPP-CREST
1612 K Street, NW
Suite 202
Washington, DC 20006
contact us
discussion groups
efficiencyefficiency hydrogenhydrogen solarsolar windwind geothermalgeothermal bioenergybioenergy hydrohydro policypolicy
Greenbuilding Archive for June 2002
238 messages, last added Tue Nov 26 17:27:01 2002

[Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [GBlist] soy products



I have mixed feelings about current farming practices.  While many are doing better than they were in the past, current methods of agriculture are not sustainable.
 
However, having several generations of farmers in my family history I admit the vast majority (at least of family farmers) are doing as best as they know how and feel they can afford to protect their crops, land, and farms.  But the fact remains we really do not have a sustainable agricultural sytem figured out right now. Unfortunately too, the family farmer is now in the minority and is rapidly being replaced by farms owned by huge corporations.  Their interests do not always lie in sustainability although I believe some are showing interest and are doing research.  State agricultural interests are working on helping to extend the longevity of farming.  Iowa for instance has been particularly aggressive in protecting its largest business, farming, and offers educational assistance for soil and water conservation methods at least through their county agricultural extension centers. I'm sure many other states have similar programs.
 
However, there is considerable skepticism about the sustainability of even current advanced agricultural practices. Current practices of monoculture, annual crops that require high levels of tillage, of herbicides and pesticides does not appear to be sustainable.  Even with conservation tillage soil and water loss is significant. And the big trend toward genetically modified seed (and feed) is also raising serious doubts. (Along with all of the promise this may offer we simply do not understand all the potential repercussions). 
 
There are others though, such as the Land Institute in Kansas, that are taking a very different look at the future of crops and how they are planted, harvested and maintained.  And, unlike many others', there goal is to have sustainable agriculture. 
 
Developing sustainable agriculture will take time.  The good will and hard work of many will be required to get there but without the goal of having sustainable agriculture we will never get there.  The family farmer has been a mainstay of this country and I hope they remain so.  I also hope the corporate farmers will see the light and aim for long term viability too, rather than the quick buck.  Sustainability is clearly in their, and our, best interests. 
 
Cheers,
Ralph Bicknese
-----Original Message-----
From: mrjones maxine&ralph [mailto:mrjones@gwtc.net]
Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 10:00 AM
To: greenbuilding@crest.org
Subject: [GBlist] soy products

To Sarah Holland and others expressing concern with the "green-ness" of soy based products, especially re. the growing of the soy plants: do you really believe that farmers whose living depends upon the health of the soil (healthy soils do produce the best crops) are going to tolerate soil erosion, or even contribute to it? Most successful farmers are very concientious about farming in a manner to  best maintain and improve the quality of their soils. Granted, there are a very few farmers who are content to mine the soil for a few years, but they are a small minority. Most soil erosion is caused by acts of that vicious old Mother Nature with her extreme fits of excessive wind or rain that occasionally beats up on the very best and most concientious of farmers. mj